Skip to main content
African Journal of Urology
Download PDF
  • Original Research
  • Open access
  • Published:

Effects of adverse semen parameters on total oxidation status and DNA/chromatin integrity

African Journal of Urology volume 29, Article number: 44 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Infertility is a major health problem that affects 7% of the men’s population. Oxidative stress (OS) plays a significant role in the pathophysiology of male infertility. The purpose of this study comparatively evaluated the total anti-oxidation status and DNA/chromatin integrity in semen samples among different infertile men’s groups compared with the normozoospermic men.

Methods

This cross-sectional study contains four experimental groups, including teratozoospermia (Exp I), asthenoteratozoospermia (Exp II), oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (Exp III), and azoospermia (Exp IV), as well as the control group of normozoospermic men. The total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and total oxidant status (TOS) were assessed by applying the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The chromatin/DNA damage was assessed in semen samples of all study groups by applying chromomycin A3 (CMA3) and toluidine blue (TB) staining methods.

Results

The results showed significantly higher proportions of TB+ and CMA3 positive sperm in all experimental groups compared to controls (P < 0.001). TAC, TOS, and the ratio of TAC to TOS were significantly different in all experimental groups compared to the normozoospermic men (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that at least one sperm parameter abnormality, such as teratozoospermia could cause serious defects at the levels of DNA/chromatin as well as the antioxidants to oxidant balance of human spermatozoa in subfertile men with abnormal spermogram. Infertile men with sperm morphological abnormalities may benefit from simultaneous assessment of sperm DNA defects and OS.

1 Background

Infertility is the main health concern that affects about 7% of men [1]. Male infertility can be caused by different reasons, such as failure of the testis, obstruction, cryptorchidism, low semen quality, sperm abnormalities and agglutination, unexplained infertility, varicocele, ejaculatory defects, endocrine disruption, congenital disorders, environmental factors, and lifestyle [2,3,4,5]. Male infertility can be related to the over production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the semen. Specified physiological levels of ROS are essential for different natural mechanisms including sperm maturation, acrosome reaction, capacitation, and fertilization process [6]. The overabundance of ROS decreases the antioxidant defense of semen, which leads to oxidative stress (OS) [7]. Malondialdehyde (MDA), one of the main lipid peroxidation biomarkers in plasma membrane, causes a decrease in sperm motility, count, and viability and increases the morphological abnormalities via oxidative damage of lipids in biological membranes [8]. OS affects the integrity of the plasma membrane and induces premature capacitation, which causes spermatozoa less qualified for fertilization and decreases sperm motility [9]. OS can affect the mitochondrial copy number, mitochondrial DNA deletion, DNA methylation, and other DNA damage in spermatozoa, which affects semen quality and can be used as a factor to determine male fertility potential [10, 11]. The oxidative stress index (OSI) is a rapid, facile, and inexpensive indicator to determine the oxidant/antioxidant ratio in seminal plasma and serum accurately. The OSI offers an invaluable and objective assessment of redox status [12].

Sperm DNA integrity is vital to the successful fertilization process and the transfer of the parental genetic content. Impaired chromatin packaging can cause the production of free radicals, which indirectly leads to DNA backbone break by decreasing protamine and forming disulfide bonds, as the oxidative attack seems to cause poor sperm morphology [13]. Men with abnormal sperm parameters show more degrees of DNA damage [14]. The decreased seminal antioxidants may be a main factor in the process of death associated with DNA damage in teratozoospermic men [15]. Men with teratozoospermia may have a higher risk of sperm DNA break [16]. Infertile men with isolated teratozoospermia (iTZS) had higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) than normozoospermic men and increased sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) values than an infertile participant with isolated azoospermia, isolated oligozoospermia, or normal semen parameters [17]. Abnormal morphology can be caused by damage to sperm DNA, defects in chromatin density, and related unsuccessful pregnancy outcomes. The evidence highlighted the role of OS and SDF in the emergence of sperm with poor morphology [18]. The main aim of our study was to assess the differences in sperm parameters, total antioxidant capacity (TAC), total oxidant status (TOS), OSI, and chromatin quality in men with different sperm parameters and whether the presence of one sperm parameter abnormality such as teratozoospermia could affect both OS and SDF in subfertile men with variable sperm parameters.

2 Methods

2.1 Study population

In this cross-sectional study, patients were divided into five groups, which include four experimental groups and a control group. The experimental groups included 15 teratozoospermic men (Exp I, T), 13 asthenoteratozoospermic men (Exp II, AT), 13 oligoasthenoteratozoospermic men (Exp III, OAT), and 18 azoospermic men (Exp IV). Also, the control group included 22 fertile men with normal sperm parameters (Fig. 1). In this study, the semen samples were collected from 81 participants referred to Yazd reproductive sciences institute. The inclusion criteria of the control group were having normal sperm parameters and at least one child in two previous years, body mass index (BMI) ≤ 25, no history of smoking, no varicocele disease and no drug consumption, and age < 40. In the experimental groups, the inclusion criteria were the presence of BMI ≤ 25, no varicocele and infection disease and diabetes, no history of smoking, no drug consumption, no alcohol consumption, and age < 40. Exclusion criteria in all study groups included people with Pyospermia, fever, infectious diseases in the last three months, genetic problems, any infections or inflammatory diseases in the reproductive tract, sexually transmitted diseases, or erectile disorder. Our study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shahid Sadoughi University, Yazd, Iran with approval code: IR.SSU.SPH.REC.1399.004. The consent form was signed by all participants before entering the study.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The schematic view of study design

Full size image

2.2 Semen analysis

The sample collection method was by masturbation with 2–5 days of sexual abstinence. In the liquefaction process, samples were incubated at 37 °C for 20 min. All assessments of sperm parameters were done based on the World Health Organization 2021 criteria. For evaluating sperm motility, a hundred spermatozoa were assessed by a phase-contrast Microscope with × 400 magnifications. The percentages of progressive, non-progressive, and immotile spermatozoa were analyzed according to WHO [10]. The Diff-Quik staining kit (FaradidPardaz Pars Inc., Iran) was used to assess sperm morphology. The smears were stained according to the kit protocol. After that, 200 spermatozoa were evaluated by light microscopy at ×1000 magnification. The normal sperm percentage was recorded based on WHO [10].

2.3 Assessments of oxidative stress index

To evaluate the concentrations of total oxidant level (TOS) and total antioxidant level (TAC), we separated the seminal plasma of the samples from sperm cells by centrifugation at 1800 g for 10 min. The supernatant was applied to evaluate the OSI in seminal plasma. The OSI is computed by dividing TOS by TAC. The commercial kits (Naxifer TM, Navand, Salamat Co., Urmia, Iran) were applied to quantify the TOS and TAC. For preparing the samples, 107 cells of seminal plasma were washed with PBS and then homogenized with 1 ml Lysing Buffer. After centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 10 min, the supernatant was separated and used as a sample. The reagents were placed at room temperature 30 min before use. If crystals were observed, the solution was homogenized by vortexing. For the TAC assay, after the preparation, reagent 2 was mixed with reagent 3 (1:1) and vortexed. Then, fivefold the volume of the prepared solution, R1 solution was added. The final solution was used as a working solution. 5 µl of the sample/standard were poured into the wells of the plate (all standards and samples were assayed in duplicate), followed by adding 250 µl of the working solution. After 5 min, maximum absorption was recorded by a plate reader at 593 nm. For the TOS assay, after the preparation of the working and standard solution according to kit protocol, 30 µl of the sample/standard were added to the wells. 200 µl of reagent 1 and 10 µl of reagent 2 was added to the wells and incubated for 20 min. After 20 min, maximum absorption was recorded by a plate reader at 530 nm. By using statistical software such as Excel, the standard curve graph of different concentrations was obtained and according to the line formula, the TAC and TOS were calculated.

2.4 Sperm DNA/chromatin integrity

After sperm analysis, each semen sample was smeared for toluidine blue (TB) and Chromomycin A3 (CMA3) staining. To assess sperm DNA/chromatin integrity, TB and CMA3 staining were performed to determine the chromatin damage and protamine deficiency of each sample.

2.4.1 Toluidine blue staining

In the first step, smears were prepared and dried. Then, they were fixed in 96% ethanol-acetone (1:1) at 4 °C for 30 min. 0.1 Na HCl was used to hydrolyze samples at 4 °C for 5 min. The samples were washed with distilled water and then stained with 0.05% TB for 10 min at room temperature. In the last step, 200 sperm cells were evaluated at ×1000 magnification with light microscopy. Normal spermatozoa heads were stained pale blue, and abnormal spermatozoa heads were stained dark blue or purple. Abnormal spermatozoa percentage (TB+) was recorded [19].

2.4.2 Chromomycin A3

To indicate protamine deficiency, we performed Chromomycin A3 (CMA3) staining. After preparing and drying smears, Carnoy’s solution (methanol/glacial acetic acid, 3:1) was applied to fix slides at 4 °C for 10 min. Staining of smears was performed by CMA3 solution (Sigma). Then, the slides were washed, and 200 spermatozoa were calculated by a fluorescent microscope (Olympus BX5) at × 1000 magnification. The bright yellow and dull yellow spermatozoa were considered as CMA3+ and CMA3−, respectively. Finally, the abnormal spermatozoa percentage (CMA3+) was recorded [14].

2.4.3 Statistical analysis

The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20 (IBM, California, United States) was used. To assess the normality of the data, Shapiro–Wilk test was performed. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM. Variables were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis variance analysis test and the Mann–Whitney U test. In addition, Spearman’s test was applied to calculate the correlation coefficient. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3 Results

Every single one of the subjects was national Iranian, with a total mean (± SD) age of 33.78(± 5.29) years and a total mean (± SD) BMI of 24.29 (± 3.24). The age and BMI of all contributors were well-adjusted among all groups. Age and BMI did not show any significant differences (P ≥ 0.05).

Semen concentration and sperm morphology were significantly higher in the normozoospermic group compared to the other four groups (P < 0.001). The sperm normal morphology significantly declined in the infertile men with Teratozoospermia compared to the Oligoasthenoteratozoospermia group (P < 0.01). As expected, the percentages of immotile and motile sperms were respectively higher and lower in the II and III experimental groups compared to the controls (P < 0.001). Semen volume analysis did not show any difference that is worthy of attention. The semen analysis data regarding azoospermic samples were excluded due to the lack of sperm (Table 1).

Table 1 Comparison of patients’ characteristics, semen analysis results between the groups
Full size table

The chromatin integrity data demonstrated significantly higher proportions of TB+ and positive CMA3 spermatozoa in different sperm parameter variations of the experimental groups compared to the controls (P < 0.001).

There was a significant decrease in seminal plasma TAC levels in all experimental groups compared to the controls (P < 0.001). Moreover, TOS concentration significantly increased in the experimental groups compared to the normozoospermia group (P < 0.05). The OSI was almost in the balance range in the control group (OSI = 0.78 ± 0.09), while it was significantly higher (OSI = 2.77 ± 0.41) in all seminal plasma samples of the experimental groups (P < 0.001) (Table 2).

Table 2 Comparison of sperm DNA/chromatin integrity and anti-/oxidation status among different groups
Full size table

Sperm concentration, progressive motility, and normal morphology were negatively correlated with CMA3+, TB+, and TOS levels. There was a significant positive correlation between each evaluated sperm parameter and TAC levels. BMI and age of participants were not significantly correlated with any sperm parameters (Table 3).

Table 3 Correlations between sperm parameters and the indicators of chromatin integrity and anti-/oxidation status
Full size table

4 Discussion

The aim of this study was to understand the pathology of nuclear defects leading to poor sperm morphology by analyzing important markers of the OS. In the current study, Sperm DNA/chromatin integrity, OS, and sperm parameters of different infertile men's groups were compared with the normozoospermic men and clarified using standard tests.

In brief, the findings of this study indicated a significant difference between the experimental groups and control group regarding sperm parameters. Sperm chromatin quality and DNA integrity, assessed by TB and CMA3 stains, showed a significant increase in teratozoospermic different groups compared to the control group, indicating defects in protamine and sperm chromatin in infertile men. Our data were in agreement with Ying Ma et al. research suggested that amorphous head familial teratozoospermia might be caused by abnormal chromatin condensation induced by disturbances in the process of histone protamine replacement process, and the elasticity of sperm nuclei could be a new index for assessing the sperm quality [20]. Moreover, these findings are in line with the results reported by Ammar et al. who used TUNEL, single-cell gel electrophoresis (comet test), toluidine blue, and acridine orange as four assays to assess the integrity of the nuclear sperm in men with isolated teratozoospermia. The aforementioned experiments demonstrated positive correlations between DNA damage and various morphological anomalies [21, 22]. In addition, the results of another study by Ammaret al. in 2020 provided clear evidence that apoptotic changes are closely related to abnormal sperm morphology and DNA damage [15]. So, sperm protamine deficiency and DNA damage might be one of the pathways which can lead to defects in sperm morphology.

OS damage is one of the most important causes of altered sperm morphology and function and is considered an important factor in male infertility [23]. Some evidence indicates that the presence of abnormal sperm morphology and motility in semen samples could be due to the OS occurrence in infertile males [24]. Furthermore, seminal ROS overproduction may be the primary cause of teratozoospermia [25].

The imbalance between reactive oxygen species and antioxidants causes oxidative stress and may be regarded as an important contributor to infertility in men [26]. We measured the level of TOS and TAC in the seminal plasma samples. As expected, the findings of this study showed an increase in the TOS levels and a significant decrease in seminal plasma antioxidant levels in all experimental groups compared to the control group. We also detected a negative correlation between Sperm parameters (concentration, progressive motility, and normal morphology) and CMA3, TB, and TOS levels. There were significant positive correlations between each of the evaluated sperm parameters and TAC levels. In this regard, the results of a study that compared patients with teratozoospermia with fertile men found that the semen ROS production, hypocondensed chromatin, denatured DNA, and fragmented DNA were significantly higher than those for fertile men according to their ROS levels. The semen ROS production, hypocondensed chromatin, denatured DNA, and fragmented DNA were significantly higher than those for fertile men based on their ROS level. The abnormal sperm morphology was correlated positively with all these parameters.

A correlation between ROS production and DNA integrity markers was also found. SDF is the main cause of sperm morphology defects and oxidative stress is the major cause of DNA fragmentation in spermatozoa [27]. Previous studies also suggested that damage to spermatozoa DNA caused by oxidative stress could have a critical effect on the etiology of infertility [28]. Due to oxidative damage to the DNA backbone, poor semen morphology appears to be caused most commonly by defective chromatin compaction, which may induce DNA breaks and free radicals. The DNA backbone may be broken indirectly by reducing protamination and disulfide bond formation due to these [21]. Colagar et al. reported that seminal TAC decreased in asthenoteratozoospermia and Oligoasthenoteratozoospermic men compared to healthy individuals, similar to our results [29]. In addition, Dehghanpour et al., aiming to compare semen parameters, protamine deficiency, and apoptosis between patients with teratozoospermia (tapered heads) and those with normozoospermia, suggested that apoptosis and abnormal chromatin packaging in tapered-head spermatozoa may contribute to the impaired fertility of teratozoospermic patients with this kind of abnormality, causing impaired fertility in these patients [30].

Treating the patient with oral antioxidant vitamins is often a standard procedure to reduce ROS formation and emend male fertility competency [31]. Evidence suggests indiscriminate consumption of antioxidants may damage sperm cells through a reductive-stress-induced state. Therefore, the “antioxidant paradox” must be carefully avoided and fully investigated. Because of these issues, oxidation–reduction potential (ORP) evolved as a valuable tool for assessing the overall balance between oxidants and antioxidants (reductants) in semen [26].

To avoid reductive stress, the oxidative status of the seminal plasma must also be evaluated pre-treatment to proceed with micronutrient supplementation safely. Supplements have the ability to improve male fertility potential and support sperm quality under these conditions [32].

According to recent reports as well as our findings, it seems that evaluating the oxidative status, antioxidant defense systems, and DNA damage, along with semen parameters might be a useful tool for the diagnosing and treating male infertility. More investigation is necessary to improve therapy options and our knowledge of these pathways.

5 Conclusion

In conclusion, our study demonstrated that DNA defects are much higher in abnormal semen samples than in normozoospermic ones. Also, the subfertile men with poor semen parameters represented significantly higher rates of OSI in comparison with semen samples with normal qualities. From this perspective, simultaneous assessment of sperm DNA defects and OS offers supplementary metrics for sperm quality analysis and may help in determining the most effective treatment method for teratozoospermic men.

Availability of data and materials

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author Dr. Farzaneh Fesahat on request.

Abbreviations

AT:

Asthenoteratozoospermia

BMI:

Body mass index

CMA3:

Chromomycin A3

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

Exp:

Experimental group

iTZS:

Isolated teratozoospermia

MDA:

Malodialdehyde

NLR:

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio

OAT:

Oligoasthenoteratozoospermia

OS:

Oxidative stress

OSI:

Oxidative stress index

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

SD:

Standard deviation

SDF:

Sperm DNA fragmentation

SEM:

Standard error of means

SPSS:

The statistical package for the social sciences

T:

Teratozoospermia

TAC:

Total antioxidant capacity

TB:

Toluidine blue

TOS:

Total oxidant status

WHO:

World health organization

References

  1. Karavolos S, Panagiotopoulou N, Alahwany H, Martins da Silva S (2020) An update on the management of male infertility. Obstetr Gynaecol 22(4):267–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kolesnikova L, Kolesnikov S, Kurashova N, Bairova T (2015) Causes and factors of male infertility. Ann Russian Acad Med Sci 70(5):579–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Durairajanayagam D (2018) Lifestyle causes of male infertility. Arab J Urol 16(1):10–20

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Babakhanzadeh E, Nazari M, Ghasemifar S, Khodadadian A (2020) Some of the factors involved in male infertility: a prospective review. Int J General Med 13:29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Machen GL, Sandlow JI (2020) Causes of male infertility. Male infertility. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–14

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dutta S, Sengupta P, Das S, Slama P, Roychoudhury S (2022) Reactive nitrogen species and male reproduction: physiological and pathological Aspects. Int J Mol Sci 23(18):10574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Bisht S, Dada R (2017) Oxidative stress: major executioner in disease pathology, role in sperm DNA damage and preventive strategies. Front Biosci-Scholar 9(3):420–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Khan I (2022) Sperm quality parameters and oxidative stress: exploring correlation in fluoride-intoxicated rats. J Human Reprod Sci 15(3):219–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Walczak-Jedrzejowska R, Wolski JK, Slowikowska-Hilczer J (2013) The role of oxidative stress and antioxidants in male fertility. Centr Eur J Urol 66(1):60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Organization WH (2021) WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen

  11. Raad MV, Fesahat F, Talebi AR, Hosseini-Sharifabad M, Horoki AZ, Afsari M et al (2022) Altered methyltransferase gene expression, mitochondrial copy number and 4977-bp common deletion in subfertile men with variable sperm parameters. Andrologia 54(10):e14531

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Abuelo A, Hernández J, Benedito JL, Castillo C (2013) Oxidative stress index (OSi) as a new tool to assess redox status in dairy cattle during the transition period. Animal 7(8):1374–1378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Oumaima A, Tesnim A, Zohra H, Amira S, Ines Z, Sana C et al (2018) Investigation on the origin of sperm morphological defects: oxidative attacks, chromatin immaturity, and DNA fragmentation. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 25(14):13775–13786

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Afsari M, Fesahat F, Talebi AR, Agarwal A, Henkel R, Zare F et al (2022) ANXA2, SP17, SERPINA5, PRDX2 genes, and sperm DNA fragmentation differentially represented in male partners of infertile couples with normal and abnormal sperm parameters. Andrologia 54(10):e14556

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ammar O, Mehdi M, Muratori M (2020) Teratozoospermia: Its association with sperm DNA defects, apoptotic alterations, and oxidative stress. Andrology 8(5):1095–1106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jakubik-Uljasz J, Gill K, Rosiak-Gill A, Piasecka M (2020) Relationship between sperm morphology and sperm DNA dispersion. Translat Androl Urol 9(2):405–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Candela L, Boeri L, Capogrosso P, Cazzaniga W, Pozzi E, Belladelli F et al (2021) Correlation among isolated teratozoospermia, sperm DNA fragmentation and markers of systemic inflammation in primary infertile men. PLoS ONE 16(6):e0251608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Efremov EA, Kasatonova EV, Melnik YI, Nikushina AA (2017) Isolated teratozoospermia: is there a role for antioxidant therapy. Urologiia (Moscow, Russia 1999) 15(5):124–131

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rahiminia T, Yazd EF, Fesahat F, Moein MR, Mirjalili AM, Talebi AR (2018) Sperm chromatin and DNA integrity, methyltransferase mRNA levels, and global DNA methylation in oligoasthenoteratozoospermia. Clin Exp Reprod Med 45(1):17–24

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ma Y, Xie N, Li Y, Zhang B, Xie D, Zhang W et al (2019) Teratozoospermia with amorphous sperm head associate with abnormal chromatin condensation in a Chinese family. Syst Biol Reprod Med 65(1):61–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Oumaima A, Tesnim A, Zohra H, Amira S, Ines Z, Sana C et al (2018) Investigation on the origin of sperm morphological defects: oxidative attacks, chromatin immaturity, and DNA fragmentation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:13775–13786

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ammar O, Haouas Z, Hamouda B, Hamdi H, Hellara I, Jlali A et al (2019) Relationship between sperm DNA damage with sperm parameters, oxidative markers in teratozoospermic men. Eur J Obstetr Gynecol Reprod Biol 233:70–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Alahmar AT (2019) Role of oxidative stress in male infertility: an updated review. J Human Reprod Sci 12(1):4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Moretti E, Signorini C, Noto D, Corsaro R, Collodel G (2022) The relevance of sperm morphology in male infertility. Front Reprod Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2022.945351

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Agarwal A, Tvrda E, Sharma R (2014) Relationship amongst teratozoospermia, seminal oxidative stress and male infertility. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 12(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Symeonidis EN, Evgeni E, Palapelas V, Koumasi D, Pyrgidis N, Sokolakis I et al (2021) Redox balance in male infertility: excellence through moderation—“Μέτρον ἄριστον.” Antioxidants 10(10):1534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Wright C, Milne S, Leeson H (2014) Sperm DNA damage caused by oxidative stress: modifiable clinical, lifestyle and nutritional factors in male infertility. Reprod Biomed Online 28(6):684–703

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hosen MB, Islam MR, Begum F, Kabir Y, Howlader MZH (2015) Oxidative stress induced sperm DNA damage, a possible reason for male infertility. Iran J Reprod Med 13(9):525

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Colagar AH, Karimi F, Jorsaraei SGA (2013) Correlation of sperm parameters with semen lipid peroxidation and total antioxidants levels in astheno-and oligoasheno-teratospermic men. Iran Red Crescent Med J 15(9):780

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dehghanpour F, Tabibnejad N, Fesahat F, Yazdinejad F, Talebi AR (2017) Evaluation of sperm protamine deficiency and apoptosis in infertile men with idiopathic teratozoospermia. Clin Exp Reprod Med 44(2):73

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ménézo YJ, Hazout A, Panteix G, Robert F, Rollet J, Cohen-Bacrie P et al (2007) Antioxidants to reduce sperm DNA fragmentation: an unexpected adverse effect. Reprod Biomed Online 14(4):418–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dimitriadis F, Tsounapi P, Zachariou A, Kaltsas A, Sokolakis I, Hatzichristodoulou G et al (2021) Therapeutic effects of micronutrient supplements on sperm parameters: fact or fiction? Curr Pharm Des 27(24):2757–2769

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the support of Yazd Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute. The authors also wish to thank the Reproductive Immunology Research Center for the research facilities.

Funding

This study was supported by Yazd Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Maryam Imani and Minoo Vahedi Raad are co-first author also contributed to this study equally.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Reproductive Immunology Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, 8916188635, Iran

    Maryam Imani, Maliheh Afsari & Farzaneh Fesahat

  2. Department of Anatomical Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

    Minoo Vahedi Raad

Authors
  1. Maryam Imani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Minoo Vahedi Raad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maliheh Afsari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Farzaneh Fesahat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

FF designed and directed the experiment. MA and MV contributed to sample preparation. MI carried out the experiment. MV performed the analytic calculations and contributed to the interpretation of the results. All authors helped shape the research and manuscript. We can confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors and that there are no other persons who satisfied the criteria for authorship but are not listed. I further confirm that the order of authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all of us.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farzaneh Fesahat.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Our study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shahid Sadoughi University, Yazd, Iran with approval code: IR.SSU.SPH.REC.1399.004. The consent form was signed by all participants before entering the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Imani, M., Raad, M.V., Afsari, M. et al. Effects of adverse semen parameters on total oxidation status and DNA/chromatin integrity. Afr J Urol 29, 44 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-023-00377-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-023-00377-z

Keywords