Skip to main content

Primary scrotal lipoma in a pediatric patient: a case report with current literature review

Abstract

Backgrounds

Primary scrotal lipomas are benign fatty tumors that develop from adipocytes of the scrotum. The exact cause of their development is unknown. They are typically painless and may exhibit symptoms of heaviness and discomfort.

Case presentation

A 9-year-old boy presented with a painless scrotal mass that had been present since birth. The mass was located in the left hemiscrotum. Ultrasound showed an enlarged left testicle with an abnormal outline and heterogeneous texture. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a mass arising from the left hemiscrotum with no invasion of the testis. Under general anesthesia and through a scrotal incision, the mass was excised. Histopathological examination revealed a lipoma.

Conclusion

Primary scrotal lipomas are benign lesions with an unclear pathogenesis. They are very uncommon in the pediatric age group. Ultrasound is the first-line modality for diagnosing lipomas; however, it may provide ambiguity. MRI provides a more accurate assessment of the mass. Surgical excision of the mass is the standard treatment for primary scrotal lipomas.

1 Backgrounds

Lipomas are benign mesenchymal tumors that are composed of lobules of mature adipocytes. They are the most common mesenchymal soft-tissue tumors with a very rare tendency (1%) of malignant transformation [1,2,3]. The prevalence of lipoma is 2.1 per 1000 patients [4]. Lipomas can develop in any part of the body, and their pathogenesis is still unclear, but they may be associated with trauma resulting in the release of cytokines that stimulate the maturation of adipocytes [5]. Generally, the scrotal lipomas originate from the adipose tissue of the spermatic cord. Afterward, they either grow toward the scrotum or keep developing inside the spermatic cord [6]. Intrascrotal lipomas are classified into 3 categories according to their origin: (1) scrotal lipomas, (2) spermatic cord and tunica vaginalis lipoma, and (3) primary scrotal lipoma [7]. Scrotal lipomas are the most common type in this classification and are major indications in 22% of inguinal repair surgeries [8]. Primary scrotal lipomas are rare entities, usually asymptomatic and painless that may cause scrotal fullness. In rare instances, they cause minimal pain and become disabling due to their size [2, 5, 9,10,11].

Here, we describe a case of primary scrotal lipoma in a pediatric patient and provide a literature review of similar cases (Table 1).

Table 1 The reported cases of primary scrotal lipoma since 1979

2 Case presentation

2.1 Patient information

A 9-year-old boy presented with a left scrotal mass that had been present since birth (Fig. 1). His mother noticed a progressive enlargement of the mass during the past 6 months. Past medical and past surgical histories for genital disorders were both negative.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The appearance of testes upon inspection of the scrotum

2.2 Clinical findings

Inspection of the testicles and scrotum revealed a normal skin color of the scrotum. The left hemiscrotum was slightly larger and hung lower than the right. Upon palpation, there was a regular non-tense swelling below the left testicle. Inguinal examination was normal with no evidence of lymphadenopathy. Cremasteric reflux was positive.

2.3 Diagnostic assessment

Blood investigations showed normal complete blood count (CBC), renal function test, glucose, B-HCG, and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). The lactate dehydrogenase level was 244 IU/L (Reference Range: 126–220). C-reactive protein level was 11.32 mg/L (should be ≤ 6.2 mg/L). Scrotal ultrasound (U/S) revealed an enlarged left testicle (5 × 2 cm) with an abnormal outline and heterogeneous texture. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis and scrotum revealed an extratesticular lesion that was arising from the left side scrotum without evidence of invasion or extension to the adjacent testicle (Fig. 2). The lesion measured 6.5 × 4.5 × 2 cm. It was hyperintense on T1 and T2 weighted imaging, suppressed on fat suppression sequence, and showed no suspicious post-contrast enhancement. Both testicles were normal in size, shape, and signal intensity with no obvious testicular lesion.

Fig. 2
figure 2

A Axial T1WI showed hyperintense signal intensity mass, B sagittal T2WI showed hyperintense signal intensity mass, C STIR showed hypointense mass within scrotal sac (arrow), the lesion is in contact but separable from testicles (arrowhead), D post-contrast fat suppression T1WI showed a hypointense signal mass, no appreciable post-contrast enhancement

2.4 Therapeutic intervention and follow-up

Under general anesthesia, a left inguinal incision was done. The cord was identified and the testicle was brought out from the incision. No hernial sac was seen. The mass could not be excised from the inguinal incision. Therefore, a scrotal incision was made (Fig. 3). The mass was about 8 cm at the base of the scrotum and was excised.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Intraoperative excision of the mass through a scrotal incision

Histopathological examination showed a well-defined capsulated mass composed of lobules of mature fatty tissue which was consistent with a lipoma (Fig. 4). The post-operative period was uneventful and follow-up was done using scrotal U/S. The patient is doing well.

Fig. 4
figure 4

A The lesion has a thin fibrous capsule and is composed of sheets of mature adipocytes. B The adipocytes do not show significant variation in cell size. C There are small, scattered fibrous areas without atypical, hyperchromatic nuclei. D The adipocyte nuclei are bland and small with fine chromatin. [Hematoxylin and eosin; 40 × (A), 100 × (B, C), and 400 × (D) magnification]

3 Discussion

Primary scrotal lipomas are benign mesenchymal neoplasms that originate from adipose tissue in the scrotal wall [6]. Intrascrotal lipomas are classified into 3 categories according to their origin: (1) Scrotal lipomas originate from the adipocytes of the spermatic cord and develop toward the scrotum, (2) spermatic cord and tunica vaginalis lipoma originate and develop within the spermatic cord, and (3) for primary scrotal lipoma, the origin of this type is the scrotal wall [7]. According to Fujimura's classification, our case was classified as a primary scrotal lipoma.

The majority of testicular tumors are malignant while tumors of the structures around the testes are mostly benign, including lipomas. The cause of lipomas remains unclear but in younger patients, the cause is thought to be congenital [12].

A thorough search of the literature was conducted on Google Scholar and PubMed/Medline using the phrase “scrotal lipoma”. Reports without full text, cases before the existence of Fujimura’s classification, and those published in predatory journals [13, 14] were excluded. Only cases of primary scrotal lipomas were included. To date, 18 cases of primary scrotal lipomas have been recorded. The age range of patients with primary scrotal lipoma was 1 month to 67 years old [2, 3, 6,7,8,9,10,11, 15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. The mean age was 40 years and the median age was 43.5 years. An equal number of right and left primary scrotal lipomas have been recorded: 6/18, 33% on the right [2, 7, 8, 16, 18, 23] and 6/18, 33% on the left [3, 10, 11, 17, 19, 22]. Only 3 cases of bilateral scrotal lipoma have been recorded (3/18, 16.67%) [20, 21]. There were three cases of midline scrotal lipomas (3/18, 16.67%) with one of them being a pendulous mass [6, 9, 15]. Out of the 18 cases, only 2 of them were of pediatric age [9, 15]. Our case was the third case of scrotal lipoma in the pediatric age group. Zarami et al. reported the largest case of primary scrotal lipoma in an adult measuring 60 × 40 × 12 cm and weighing 38.4 kg [2]. Among the pediatric age group, the mass in our case was the largest, measuring 6.5 × 4.5 × 2 cm. Most of the patients with primary scrotal lipoma did not have pain and reported only discomfort and swelling that had been growing in size. Three patients reported the presence of pain [10, 11, 18], one complained of dysesthesia [19], two reported the mass being disabling [2, 20], and two reported the mass hindering sexual activity [2, 20].

While it has been reported that primary scrotal lipomas occur in boys and younger men [9, 15, 17, 23], our review showed that the majority of the cases (12/18, 66.67%) were 40 or older. Recurrence of scrotal lipoma was reported after 2 years in a 63-year-old man [8].

The first-line modality used for scrotal lesions is the U/S scan because it is widely available, cheap, and does not have any risk of radiation or ionization [8]. U/S scans can reveal the nature of the lesion and show if the lesion is intratesticular or extratesticular [17]. On U/S, lipomas appear as distinct hypoechoic masses. U/S is limited by its inability to differentiate a lipoma from a liposarcoma [8]. While the advantages of U/S have been highlighted, in our case, the U/S examination only revealed an enlarged testicle with an irregular shape and a heterogeneous texture. It did not provide specific characteristics or features for a definitive diagnosis of the condition. MRI is more capable of differentiating a benign mass from a malignant tumor [19]. Lipomas appear as hyperintense masses on the T1 and T2 weighted images. A mass that appears fatty, homogenous, and well-encapsulated is suggestive of lipoma. Nonetheless, well-developed lipomas may appear heterogeneous due to other non-fat components like muscle fibers and blood vessels. MRI may also be misleading in differentiating between lipoma and low-grade liposarcoma. This will result in confusion and make the diagnosis more challenging [8, 12]. The presence of post-gadolinium enhancement of the mass is suggestive of a liposarcoma rather than a lipoma [9, 20]. Excision of the mass through a scrotal incision has been the treatment of choice for primary scrotal lipomas. Zarami et al. used a lazy S-incision from the groin to the mid-thigh to excise the mass due to its large size [2]. In our case, given the ambiguity of the U/S findings and the size of the mass, we opted for a combined inguinal and scrotal approach to eliminate any suspicion and ensure easy access to the mass.

Histopathological examination is essential for the definitive diagnosis of a scrotal lipoma and to accurately differentiate it from a liposarcoma. In lipoma, it usually reveals well-differentiated, mature, and uniform adipocytes [5], while in liposarcoma it would reveal abnormal mitosis and cellular atypia [19].

4 Conclusion

Primary scrotal lipomas are benign lesions with an unclear pathogenesis. They are very uncommon in the pediatric age group. U/S is the first-line modality for diagnosing lipomas; however, it may provide ambiguity. MRI provides a more accurate assessment of the mass. Surgical excision of the mass is the standard treatment for primary scrotal lipomas.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

CBC:

Complete blood count

B-HCG:

Beta human chorionic gonadotropin

AFP:

Alpha-fetoprotein

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

U/S:

Ultrasound

References

  1. Bashir M, Zaki IA, Mahajan MK (2013) Gaint axillary lipoma following excision. Indian J Surg 75(Suppl 1):158–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-012-0561-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zarami AB, Ibrahim H, Ibrahim AG (2018) Giant scrotal lipoma: case report and review of the literature. J Case Rep Images Urol 3:100009Z15AZ2019

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mahmood ZH, Mohemed FM, Fatih BN, Qadir AA, Abdalla SH (2023) Cancer publications in one year (2022); a cross-sectional study. Barw Med J. https://doi.org/10.58742/bmj.v1i2.30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Teles AR, Finger G, Schuster MN, Gobbato PL (2016) Peripheral nerve lipoma: case report of an intraneural lipoma of the median nerve and literature review. Asian J Neurosurg 11(4):458. https://doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.181118

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Forsmann M, McLaughlin D, Leonard T (2022) A case report of scrotal lipoma and review of lipoma pathogenesis. J Surg Case Rep 2022(5):rjac214. https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjac214

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Creta M, De Stefano G, Buonopane R, Barba C, Di Meo S, Imperatore V, Imbimbo C, Mirone V (2017) Giant primary scrotal lipoma: a case report. Arch Ital Urol Androl 89(3):243–244. https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2017.3.243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fujimura N, Kurokawa K (1979) Primary lipoma of the scrotum. Eur Urol 5:182–183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ladumor SB, Kambal AS (2019) Case report: recurrence of scrotal lipoma. Clin Case Rep Open Access

  9. Gemilang B, Hutasoit YI, Deswanto IA (2023) Giant scrotal lipoma in pediatric patient: a case report. Urol Case Rep 50:102492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eucr.2023.102492

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Mbwambo OJ, Pallangyo A, Mbwambo JS et al (2023) Primary scrotal lipoma posing a diagnostic quandary: Experience from northern Tanzania, a case report. Clin Case Rep 11:e7503. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.7503

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Fabiani A, Principi E, Filosa A, Pieramici T, Fioretti F, Maurelli V, Servi L, Mammana G (2016) An unusual case of primary intrascrotal lipoma. Arch Ital Urol Androl 88(4):345–346. https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2016.4.345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen Y, Li XN, Yi XL, Tang Y (2022) Giant bilateral scrotal lipoma with abnormal somatic fat distribution: a case report. World J Clin Cases 10(29):10803–10810. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i29.10803

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Muhialdeen AS, Ahmed JO, Baba HO, Abdullah IY, Hassan HA, Najar KA et al (2023) Kscien’s list; a new strategy to discourage predatory journals and publishers (second version). Barw Med J 1(1):1–3. https://doi.org/10.58742/bmj.v1i1.14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim SO, Im CM, Joo JS (2009) Scrotal primary lipoma with unusual clinical appearance in newborn. Urology 73(5):1024–1025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Seidu AS, Yorke J, Akpaloo J, Danso P, Sukenibe SS, Fiifi-Yankson PK, Adae-Aboagye K, Amoah G, Yamoah FA, Afful-Yorke D, Agyeman-Gyebi SNP, Brenu SG, Adjei E (2021) Giant primary scrotal lipoma in a low-resource setting: challenges with diagnosis and review of literature. J Surg Case Rep 2021(9):rjab398. https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjab398

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Srivastava KN, Agarwal A, Siddharth Vikram SS, Gupta M (2017) Huge scrotal lipoma posing a diagnostic dilemma: a case report and review of literature. Urol Case Rep 15:39–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eucr.2017.08.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Rkik M, Ettanji A, Modeste M et al (2019) Primary scrotal lipoma: a case report. Arch Nephrol Urol 2:76–79

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vignot L, Saad E, Peyromaure M, Barry DN (2020) Giant primary scrotal lipoma: a rare entity with diagnostic pitfalls. Case Rep Urol 2020:8815845. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8815845

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Zheng W, Shi M, Li T, Xu H, Chen Z, Wang X, Bai S, Le W, Yang L, Wei Q (2021) Giant bilateral primary scrotal lipoma along with lipomas in multiple sites of the body: a case report and literature review. Transl Androl Urol 10(2):983–990. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-20-1073

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Dung PTV, Son TT, Son TQ, Tuan NM (2023) Giant scrotal lipoma in Madelung’s disease: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 106:108151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2023.108151

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaplanoglu V, Kaplanoglu H, Parlak IS, Tatar IG (2013) Giant intrascrotal lipoma. BMJ Case Rep 2013:bcr2013200500. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2013-200500

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Berevoescu NI, Stanilescu S, Halcu G, Berevoescu M, Cristian D (2019) Large primary scrotal lipoma with particular presentation. Int Surg J 6(2):597–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Szmigielski W, Khairat M, Haider A, Ejeckam GC (2000) Huge scrotal lipoma masquerading as haematoma. Clin Radiol 55(6):479–480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None to be declared.

Funding

None to be declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

“SH” and “RB” are the surgeons who performed the operation and gave final approval of the manuscript. “FK” gave major contribution of the idea and final approval of the manuscript. “NH” and “BA” contributed to writing the manuscript and gave final approval of the manuscript. “EA”, “WS”, “AA”, “ZN”, and “DA” helped in critical revision and gave final approval of the manuscript. “RA” and “RR” helped in the revision of the manuscript and in the processing of the figures.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fahmi Hussein Kakamad.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient's parents for publication and accompanying images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hussein, Z.N., Bapir, R., Ali, R.M. et al. Primary scrotal lipoma in a pediatric patient: a case report with current literature review. Afr J Urol 29, 61 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-023-00391-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-023-00391-1

Keywords