Skip to main content

Leiomyosarcoma presenting as unilateral painless testicular mass in a septuagenarian: a case report with review of the literature

Abstract

Background

Primary testicular leiomyosarcoma has a rare occurrence and the diagnosis is uncertain on pre-operative assessment. It is often seen in the background of chronic inflammation, radiotherapy, and the use of high-dose anabolic steroids.

Case presentation

We report a case of a painless testicular lump in a septuagenarian with pre-existing diabetes mellitus and hypertension but without any oncological risk factors. The primary workup did not reveal any elevation of serum tumour markers or any signs of metastatic disease on contrast imaging. The patient underwent a high inguinal orchiectomy due to a suspicion of germ cell tumor, and histopathology and immunohistochemistry confirmed the diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma.

Conclusion

Testicular leiomyosarcoma in the elderly is a rare malignancy and usually occur without any pre-existing risk factors. Early treatment provides long-term curative oncological control.

Introduction

Testicular neoplasms represent up to 5% of all urological tumours. They are seen in the 2nd–4th decades of life and are predominantly of germinal origin [1]. Although the incidence of germ cell testicular cancer has been increasing over recent years, soft tissue sarcomas are an uncommon diagnostic entity, accounting for approximately 1% of all adult malignancies [2, 3].

Germ cell tumours in the elderly have been reported sporadically with falling incidence with age [4]. Elderly men with testicular lumps are mostly diagnosed with either spermatocytic seminomas, primary testicular lymphoma, or stromal tumours, usually of the Leydig cell type, and rarely metastasis [4]. Sarcomas are infrequently diagnosed, and the diagnosis is entirely based on pathological assessment and immunohistochemistry. Sarcomas are, by definition, indolent in nature and carry a favourable prognosis due to their muted risk of metastasis.

Case presentation

A 70-year-old man presented with a painless left testicular swelling for more than 6 months and had indolent progression. The patient was diabetic and hypertensive with a past history of left hydrocele repair. He did not consume alcohol or tobacco and was a non-smoker. There was no history of malignancies in the family or any prior exposure to carcinogenic stimuli. Physical examination revealed a hard, non-tender, enlarged left testicle with the absence of superficial inguinal lymphadenopathy. Serum tumour markers, i.e., Alpha-feto protein (AFP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and b-Human chorionic gonadotropin (b-HCG), were within normal limits. The ultrasound evaluation showed an 8 × 9 cm hypoechoic lesion involving the left testicle with an unremarkable spermatic cord.

Contrast-enhanced a computed tomography (CECT) scan confirmed a large left testicular mass of 8 × 10 cm without any retroperitoneal or pelvic lymph node enlargement or any evidence of visceral metastasis (Fig. 1). Clinically, it was defined as T1N0M0. The patient underwent left high inguinal orchiectomy under spinal anaesthesia. The pathological assessment demonstrated the presence of malignant spindle cells with moderate nuclear pleomorphism and areas of haemorrhage, necrosis, and hyalinization within the tumour, stage PT1bN0Mx. The tumour was positive for SMA, h-Caldesmon, and Desmin, whereas negative for S-100 and CD117 (Fig. 2). The tumour was categorised as FNCLCC grade 1 with ENNEKING staging 1A. The postoperative follow-up showed no complications.

Fig. 1
figure 1

CECT reveals a heterogenous left testicular mass without any scrotal wall invasion

Fig. 2
figure 2

Malignant spindle cell tumor arranged in fascicular pattern, A ×10 Magnification, B ×40 Magnification. C Bizarre Multi-nucleate giant cells (marked). D Areas of nuclear pleomorphism, necrosis and hyalinization. E Desmin stain positive. F S-100 stain negative

The postoperative period was uneventful and the patient was discharged on the next postoperative day. At 4 weeks and 3 months post-operatively, the patient was doing well with no evidence of local recurrence or distant metastasis.

Discussion

Leiomyosarcoma of the testis is believed to arise from undifferentiated smooth muscle cells of mesenchymal origin, such as blood vessels, seminiferous tubules, and tunica [5]. Primary leiomyosarcoma of the testis is a rare malignancy and only a handful of cases have been reported till now [6, 7]. These tumours are seen between the fourth and seventh decades, and the mean age of presentation is 50 years [8]. These patients present with a painless testicular mass and vague discomfort in the inguinoscrotal region. Scrotal ultrasound is usually performed, and it shows a hypoechoic and well-circumscribed mass, with or without calcification. Tumour markers such as HCG, AFP, and LDH are usually within normal limits [8]. Similarly, our case also presented with a painless testicular mass with normal serum tumour markers. Previous history of radiotherapy and the use of anabolic steroids are commonly identified risk factors for testicular leiomyosarcoma in patients less than 50 years old [9, 10]. In contrast, our patient did not have any such history of radiation or use of anabolic steroids.

Abdallah et al., in their literature review of 31 cases [11], reported that age at presentation varied significantly, with a mean age of 50.7 years and ranged from as early as 8 months to 78 years [8, 12] The tumour size ranged from 2 to 10 cm, with no preference for tumour laterality. Among 31 patients, 28 had normal serum markers except two had raised LDH and one patient had raised B-HCG levels. Of the 31 patients, 24 remained disease-free on long-term follow-up. One patient developed a local recurrence and six patients developed distant metastasis. Local recurrence was treated by local wide excision with or without radiotherapy. Retroperitoneal metastasis was treated by radiotherapy, and visceral metastasis was treated by chemotherapy alone.

Testicular tumours in the elderly population usually occur without any pre-existing risk factors. There are several differentials of leiomyosarcoma in elderly population. The incidence of GCTs in men older than 60 years of age is extremely low, with the exception of spermatocytic seminomas, a distinct GCT generally associated with a benign course. Spermatocytic seminoma is associated with distinctive clinical and pathological characteristics. They are not associated with a history of cryptorchidism, have a negative tumour marker profile, and are almost never associated with metastasis [13]. Other differentials include primary testicular lymphoma (PTL), an uncommon disease seen in 1–9% of all testicular neoplasms. However, it is the most common malignancy in men older than 50 years of age. DLBCL is the most common type, with anthracycline-based chemotherapy as the cornerstone of the treatment [14]. Sometimes, tumours occurring in the para-testicular region may be clinically indistinguishable from primary testicular tumours. They usually appear as scrotal masses with or without hydrocele. Only 30% of these are malignant, with liposarcoma being the most frequent, followed by leiomyosarcoma. Both of these tumours are found mainly in elderly males [15].

So far, ten cases of primary testicular leiomyosarcoma in septuagenarians have been reported (Table 1). As seen in leiomyosarcoma in the younger population, there is no side predilection, and the size of the tumour also falls within a similar range. But 3 out of 11 cases, including ours, had metastasis at presentation. This translates into 27.27% of the cases. Although the numbers are lower, still, this is a significant observation. Treatment has been high inguinal orchidectomy in the majority of cases, and the presence of localised disease on histopathology translated into good long-term outcomes. Our patient did not have any findings suggestive of metastatic disease.

Table 1 A review of literature worldwide for clinical, biological and anatomopathological results of intratesticular Leiomyosarcomas in men aged > 70 years

Due to the disease's rarity, specific histopathological criteria are lacking. Histologic grade is considered the most important prognostic factor and is predictive of cancer-specific survival and distant metastasis. The AJCC Staging System and the French Federation of Cancer Centres Sarcoma Group (FNCLCC) grading scheme are two examples. The AJCC system grades range from G1 (well-differentiated) to G4 (undifferentiated). A more widely recommended staging system, FNCLCC, is based on three parameters: mitotic rates, differentiation, and necrosis [16].

Testicular leiomyosarcomas have a better prognosis and lower metastatic potential compared to extra-testicular leiomyosarcomas. High inguinal orchidectomy is considered the ideal treatment of choice. However, the need for RPLND is not well documented, and therefore it is reserved for patients with enlarged retroperitoneal nodes on imaging [17, 18]. The need for adjuvant treatment, such as chemotherapy and radiation, is decided on a case-to-case basis and no guidelines have been formulated for the same. Adjuvant treatment has been used in patients with positive surgical margins or when a local recurrence is contemplated [19, 20].

Conclusion

Elderly testicular leiomyosarcoma is a rare malignancy and usually not associated with any pre-existing risk factors like exposure to radiation or use of anabolic steroids. Treatment is high inguinal orchidectomy and is curative if detected early, and long-term oncological outcomes are encouraging.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Albers P, Albrecht W, Algaba F, Bokemeyer C, Cohn-Cedermark G, Horwich A et al (2005) Guidelines on testicular cancer. Eur Urol 48:885–894

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gaddam SJ, Chesnut GT (2022) Testicle cancer. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing

  3. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2020) Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 70(1):7–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berney D, Warren A, Verma M et al (2008) Malignant germ cell tumors in the elderly: a histopathological review of 50 cases in men aged 60 years or over. Mod Pathol 21:54–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Arul P, Akshatha C (2016) Testicular leiomyoma masquerading as lymphoma. J Med Soc 30:176–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Giridhar V, Kumar PB, Natarajan K, Hegde P (2011) Testicular leiomyosarcoma with metastasis. Indian J Urol 27:278–279

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Moona MS, Fatima D, Turezbek A (2011) Primary testicular leiomyosarcoma. J Pak Med Assoc 61(10):1014–1016

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wakhlu A, Chaudhary A (2004) Massive leiomyosarcoma of the testis in an infant. J Pediatr Surg 39(7):e16–e17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Siraj F, Sharma S, Rai CB, Vasudeva P (2018) Primary high grade testicular leiomyosarcoma: a rare malignancy in a young male. Turk J Urol 44(2):178–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Froeher M, Fischer R, Leike S, Hakenberg OW, Noack B, Wirth MP (1999) Intratesticular leiomyosarcoma in a young man after high doping with oral Turinabol: a case report. Cancer 86:1571–1575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Abdallah H, Dergamoun H, Hachem F, Boughaleb A, Al Sayegh H, Nouini Y (2021) Testicular leiomyosarcoma: a case report and literature review. Int J Surg Case Rep 83:105996

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Hmida W, Mallat F, Othmen MB, Ben Ahmed K, Chavey S, Mestiri S, Abdallah AB, Mosbah F (2014) Primary intratesticular leiomyosarcomain a 78-year-old male. Int J Case Rep Images 5(10):717–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gigantino V, La Mantia E, Franco R, Cecere S, Rossetti S, Di Napoli M, Pisano C, Berretta M, Galzerano A, Botti G, Pignata S, Facchini G (2013) Testicular and testicular adnexa tumors in the elderly. Anticancer Drugs 24(3):228–236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zucca E, Conconi A, Mughal TI, Sarris AH, Seymour JF, Vitolo U et al (2003) Patterns of outcome and prognostic factors in primary large-cell lymphoma of the testis in a survey by the International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group. J Clin Oncol 21:20–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Varzaneh FE, Verghese M, Shmookler BM (2002) Paratesticular leiomyosarcoma in an elderly man. Urology 60:1112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zagars GK, Ballo MT, Pisters PW, Pollock RE, Patel SR, Benjamin RS et al (2003) Prognostic factors for patients with localized soft-tissue sarcoma treated with conservation surgery and radiation therapy: an analysis of 1225 patients. Cancer 97(10):2530–2543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Singh R, Chandra A, O’Brien TS (2004) Primary intratesticular leiomyosarcoma in a mixed race man: a case report. Clin Pathol 57:1319–1320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang X, Chen Z, Qiu S, Cao D, Jin K, Li J, Chen B, Lei H, Huang Y, Bao Y, Yang L, Liu L, Wei Q (2021) Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of testicular sarcoma: a population-based study. Front Oncol 11:614093

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Rajkomar K, Mundy I (2007) Leiomyosarcoma of the scrotum—a rare tumour. N Z Med J 120:U2835

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ballo MT, Zagars GK, Pisters PW et al (2001) Spermatic cord sarcoma: outcome, patterns of failure and management. J Urol 166:1306–1310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

No external funding received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BJ and RG had reviewed literature and written the case report. AK was the primary surgeon involved in treating the patient. RM and SC were involved in formulation of paper and review. SKR was involved in review of literature. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ritesh Goel.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Consent taken from the patient for publication of this case report.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images.

Competing interests

No competing interest among the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Joshi, B., Goel, R., Kumar, A. et al. Leiomyosarcoma presenting as unilateral painless testicular mass in a septuagenarian: a case report with review of the literature. Afr J Urol 28, 57 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-022-00325-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-022-00325-3

Keywords

  • Leiomyosarcoma
  • Testicular mass
  • Geriatric oncology
  • Painless testis mass