Skip to main content

The use of bladder voiding efficiency in assessing benign prostatic enlargement

Abstract

Background

The management of benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) in low resource settings poses a major challenge in Africa. The objective of the study was to investigate the accuracy of Bladder Voiding Efficiency (BVE) to assess lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) among BPE patients in a low resource setting.

Methods

From December 2017 to March 2018, patients with benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) were recruited into the study. The study was a prospective cross-sectional study. Participants had the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) recorded followed by evaluation of their Bladder Voiding Efficiency (BVE). The BVE was calculated as the ratio of the volume of Urine voided over total volume of Urine in the bladder at the time of the void. The data were analysed to show the Sensitivity and Specificity of BVE in symptomatic LUTS. The Pearson correlation co-efficient between IPSS and BVE was analysed.

Results

The study recruited 94 participants. The age range was 45 to 85 year. The mean age was 68.1 years. The sensitivity of BVE to detect severe LUTS was 97.97%, while the specificity of BVE to detect mild to moderate disease was 97.78%. The correlation coefficient between IPSS and BVE was negatively correlated at 0.89, and this was statistically significant (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The Bladder Voiding Efficiency (BVE) is a highly sensitive and specific test in our population to detect LUTS. It is well correlated to the International Prostate Severity Score in this study population.

Background

There has been an increase in the prevalence of BPE in Africa in the last 10 years because of life-style changes [1, 2]. The prevalence of BPE ranges from 40 to 60% among men over 50 years of age in Africa [3]. The increase in metabolic syndromes and the related changes in diet as well as life-style have also been linked to this increase in BPE/LUTS in Africa [4].

The evaluation of BPE/LUTS in low-resource setting poses a challenge because of the low utilisation of the IPSS score and the sparsity of Urological services in Africa [5, 6].

The use of BVE as an objective tool to determine the severity of BPE/LUTS in low-resource settings has been minimal [7].

The simple BVE technique is easy to use, minimally invasive and can be done by non-Physicians. This makes it very suitable for use in low-resource setting where other urological diagnostic services may not be available [8].

The objective of this study was to determine the acceptability and accuracy of using BVE to determine the severity of BPH/LUTS using the IPSS score as a gold standard.

Methods

The study was performed at the Ndola Teaching Hospital Urology Outpatient Clinic from December 2017 to March 2018. This study was approved by the Ethics Review Board of our hospital. Prior to recruitment, it was ensured that all patients included in the study had provided appropriate informed consent. A research questionnaire was administered to each patient to obtain all vital epidemiological data from the patient.

The case definition of a participant was any patient aged 45 to 85 years with clinical evidence of BPE and evidence of LUTS attributable to BPE. Patients with urethral disease, neurological disease, Prostate or Bladder malignancies or complicated BPE were excluded from the study. In addition all patients with medical conditions such as Diabetes Mellitus, Cardiac Failure or any conditions that might affect bladder function were also excluded.

The standard IPSS was administered to each patient by a trained nurse and the total score computed. The patient was asked to do an initial void, the voided volume (V) as well as the post-void residual urine (PVR) were measured. These were recorded as V1 and PVR1. The bladder was emptied completely thereafter. Once the bladder was emptied, it was filled passively with 200mls of Saline at room temperature. The patient was then instructed to void a second time. The volumes obtained were recorded as V2 (voided urine volume) and PVR2 (post-void urine volume), respectively. The average of V1 and V2 as well as PVR1 and PVR2 were used to obtain mean void and mean PVR volumes, respectively. The Bladder Voiding Efficiency (BVE) was then computed as the ratio of mean void to Total Bladder Capacity (mean void + mean post-void urine volume).

Each participant recruited had an IPSS administered them. The IPSS scores were grouped into two categories. Those with a score of ≤ 18 were Group 1, which was mild to moderate symptoms. Those with a score of ≥ 19 were Group 2, which was classed as severe symptoms.

The BVE results were also grouped into two. The participants with a BVE ≥ 75% were in Group 1 and were said to have good voiding efficiency. Those with a BVE ≤ 74% were Group 2, with poor voiding efficiency. The cut-off used was based on recently published literature on BVE measure of good bladder function [9].

The participants were also asked about the acceptability of BVE as a method of assessing severity of LUTS. The results were analysed to provide an acceptability rate of the technique among the participants.

The data were coded and then entered into the Excel 2013 software with double entry verification. The IPSS was used as the Gold Standard. Sensitivity was defined as the ability of the BVE to detect severe IPSS, while Specificity was defined as the ability of BVE to detect mild and moderate IPSS. These ratios were computed as percentages. The correlation coefficient was the extent and direction of the relationship between the BVE and the IPSS in this data set. The Pearson coefficients and the specificity/sensitivity were analysed using SPSS version 20 software.

Results

The study recruited a total of 102 patients. However, 8 were not enrolled because they had confounding co-morbidities. The study had 94 participants who were enroled into the study and for whom a complete data set was collected. The age-range was between 49 and 85 years with a mean age of 68.1 (standard deviation [SD] ± 7.49 years). (Table 1).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of study population

The mean IPSS score was 18.81 ± 10.7 SD with a minimum score of 1 and a maximum score of 31. Of the 94 enroled, 49 (52%) had severe symptoms, 21 (22%) had moderate symptoms and 24 (26%) showed scores mild symptoms (Table 1).

In assessment of the acceptability of the procedure by participants, 86 (91.5%) found it acceptable and 8 (8.5%) did not find it acceptable.

The BVE was used as the test and the IPSS as the gold standard. Table 2 shows the sensitivity, specificity, as well as the positive and negative predictive values. The sensitivity of the BVE was 97.96%. The specificity was calculated as 97.78%. The positive predictive value was 97.96% and negative predictive values were both 97.78%.

Table 2 Sensitivity and specificity

The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.89. This was a negative correlation with a P value of < 0.001.

Discussion

There is a rising prevalence of BPE/LUTS in Africa due to increasing lifestyle change and an increase in life expectancy [1, 2].The study found the mean age at presentation to be 68.1 years. The IPSS pattern found in the study is similar to what other studies in this region have shown [11, 12]. The mean IPSS score of 18.8 did not differ significantly from that found in previous studies at the site as well as other regional studies [4, 13]. The pattern of presentation in the study of 52% with severe symptoms (Table 1) was high compared to other studies which have shown mainly predominance of moderate symptoms [4, 13]. Ogwuche et al. in their study of 120 patients at the Jos University Teaching Hospital showed that most patients (59%) had moderate symptoms. Strother et al. in their study of 473 patients in Uganda showed increasing severity of symptoms score in the specialist clinics relative to those in the community-based studies [14]. This suggests that patients present late due to difficulty of access to urology services in Africa, which is well documented [4, 13,14,15].

The determination of the severity of BPH/LUTS in clinical settings, especially in low resourced settings is difficult. The introduction of IPSS by Barry in 1992 provided a tool for assessing severity of BPH/LUTS. However its use in low resourced setting has been difficult due to various problems including low literacy rates, visual problems in elderly men and the low number of Urologist to population in these settings [4, 5]. Unlike the Cardiac emptying which leaves an end systolic volume to promote contractility, Bladder emptying is normally expected to leave minimal to no residual urine. The increase in post-void residual has been used by Urologists as an index to measure of Bladder outflow obstruction. However the absence of a clear cut off for post-void residual urine has reduced its usage and value. Increasingly the use of BVE as a more accurate measure of Bladder Function or Dysfunction has been shown by a number of studies (7.8.9.10). This is especially important in the distinction between medical and surgical management of BPH/LUTs as shown by Choo et al. in 2014. In their study they propose a BVE cut off of 75%. When BVE falls below this cut off secondary Bladder changes are likely to occur which may be inversible, because of the persistence of high Bladder pressures.

The study found a high acceptability for the use of the BVE for evaluation of severity of LUTS at 91.5% (Table 1). Other studies have shown high acceptability for this tool in accessing LUTS in BPH and other Bladder Outflow Obstruction (BOO) patients [7, 9, 15].

The Sensitivity and Specificity of BVE were very high at 97.96% and 97.87%, respectively. This was much higher than that found at the same site using the Single Question Nocturia Score (SQNS) where the Sensitivity and Specificity of this tool was 87% and 91%, respectively [4]. Other tools have demonstrated higher correlation with IPSS score such as the Visual IPSS Score and the UWIN score with a correlation coefficient of 0.72 and 0.913, respectively [17,18,19,20].The study found the BVE had a high correlation with IPSS though the correlation was negative. This meant the higher the voiding efficiency, the lower the IPSS score. The correlation coefficient was 0.89 (P < 0.001) Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The Pearson’s correlation coefficient (R) for this relationship as shown by the Scatter Plot was − 0.89 at P < 0.001

The BVE parameter has also been used successfully to measure post-operation LUTS as well as to measure LUTS in women with BOO [8, 9].

The BE may also have value in the discrimination of those patients with severe LUTS requiring early surgical treatment over those with whom initial medical treatment may improve symptoms. It is possible that a delay in this process may result in secondary Bladder changes which may not be correctable even after surgery [9, 10].

Conclusion

This study finding shows that simple BVE evaluation can be used to accurately assess LUTS, in low-resource settings. This tool also has a high acceptability in this study population. The BVE indices may also be valuable in distinguishing those patients  in whom surgery is indicated in contrast to those who can be given medical treatment. This decision could help to reduce the number of patients whose LUTS persists even after medical treatment.

Availability of data and materials

The data base contain the study variables is available in MS Excel and is accessible to the journal and reviewers upon request. It has also been attached as supplementary file in the submission documents.

Abbreviations

BOO:

Bladder outflow obstruction

BPE:

Benign prostatic enlargement

BVE:

Bladder voiding efficiency

IPSS:

International prostate severity score

LUTS:

Lower urinary tract symptoms

PVR:

Post void residual urine

SQNS:

Single question nocturia score

UWIN:

Urgency, weak stream, incomplete emptying and nocturia

References

  1. Yeboah ED (2016) Prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer in Africans and Africans in the diaspora. J West Afr College Surg 6(4):1

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chokkalingam AP, Yeboah ED, Demarzo A, Netto G, Yu K, Biritwum RB, Tettey Y, Adjei A, Jadallah S, Li Y, Chu LW (2012) Prevalence of BPH and lower urinary tract symptoms in West Africans. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 15(2):170–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ejike CE, Ezeanyika LU (2008) Metabolic syndrome in sub-Saharan Africa:“smaller twin” of a region’s prostatic diseases? Int Urol Nephrol 40(4):909–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kajimotu T, Bowa K (2018) Accuracy of a “single question nocturia score” compared to the “international prostate symptoms score” in the evaluation of lower urinary tract symptoms in benign prostatic hyperplasia: a study performed at Ndola teaching hospital, Ndola. Zambia Plos one 13(6):e0198096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bowa K (2013) International prostate symptoms score usage in a developing country. Annal Afr Med 12(3):174

    Google Scholar 

  6. Launer BM, McVary KT, Ricke WA, Lloyd GL (2021) The rising worldwide impact of benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int 127(6):722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Abrams P (1999) Bladder outlet obstruction index, bladder contractility index and bladder voiding efficiency: three simple indices to define bladder voiding function. Br J Urol Int 84:14–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bosch RSLH, Krause R (1995) Dependence of male voiding efficiency on age, bladder contractility and urethral resistance: development of a voiding efficiency normogram. J Urol 154:190–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Choo MS, Cho SY, Han JH, Lee SH, Paick JS, Son H (2014) The cutoff value of bladder voiding efficiency for predicting surgical outcomes after GreenLight HPS™ laser photoselective vaporization of the prostate. J Endourol 28(8):969–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. O’Leary MP, Barry MJ, Fowler FJ Jr (1992) Hard measures of subjective outcomes: validating symptom indexes in urology. J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)36965-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jumbe SA (1982) Experience in prostatectomy in Zanzibar using roll-gauge packing. East Afr Med J 59(9):599–604

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kachimba SJ (1988) Surgical management of benign prostate hyperplasia in the university teaching hospital. M. Med Dissertation 1988: University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

  13. Udeh EI, Ozoemena OF, Ogwuche E (2012) The relationship between prostate volume and international prostate symptom score in Africans with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Niger J Med 21(3):290–295

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stothers L, Macnab AJ, Bajunirwe F, Mutabazi S, Berkowitz J (2017) Associations between the severity of obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms and care-seeking behavior in rural Africa: a cross-sectional survey from Uganda. PLoS ONE 12(3):e0173631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bajunirwe F, Stothers L, Berkowitz J, Macnab AJ (2018) Prevalence estimates for lower urinary tract symptom severity among men in Uganda and sub-Saharan Africa based on regional prevalence data. Can Urol Assoc J 12(11):E447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Roehrborn CG, Kaminetsky JC, Auerbach SM, Montelongo RM, Elion-Mboussa A, Viktrup L (2010) Changes in peak urinary flow and voiding efficiency in men with signs and symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia during once daily tadalafil treatment. BJU Int 105(4):502–507

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ramaraju K, Rajan K, Kalyanasundaram S, Chennakrishnan I (2016) Comparison of uwin score with international prostatic symptom score in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. J Evol Med Dent Sci 5(80):5942–5947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Heyns CF, Van der Walt CLE, Groeneveld AE (2012) Correlation between a new visual prostate symptom score (VPSS) and uroflowmetry parameters in men with lower urinary tract symptoms. S Afr Med J 102(4):237–240

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Badı́a X, Garcı́a-Losa M, Dal-Ré R, Carballido J, Serra M. (1998) Validation of a harmonized Spanish version of the IPSS: evidence of equivalence with the original American scale. Urology 52(4):614–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mallya A, Keshavamurthy R, Karthikeyan VS, Kumar S, Nagabhushana M, Kamath AJ (2017) UWIN (Urgency, Weak stream, Incomplete Void, Nocturia) Score for assessment of lower urinary tract symptoms: could it replace the American urology association symptom index score? An open label randomized cross over trial. LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. Feb 1.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Ndola Teaching Hospital Urology Unit and the Copperbelt University School of Medicine for hosting the study.

Funding

The study received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KB conceptualised and supervised the research. PK organised the research site, collected and analysed the data. The final paper was co-written by both KB and PK. Both authors read and approved by the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kasonde Bowa.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Research Ethic Committee of the Tropical Disease Research Centre in December 2017.Research approval was obtained from the Bio-medical Ethics Review Committee of Tropical Diseases Research Centre (TDRC), IRB registration number: 00002911, FWA number: 00003729 and research number TRC/C4/09/2017. The methods outlined in this research were strictly adhered to the safety and well-being of the patient.

Consent for publication

The authors provide consent to the AFJU to publish the materials and pictures contained in the manuscripts.

Competing of interests

The authors declare that we have no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

This file contains the patient data for all the patients who were recruited in the study. It includes the independent and dependent variables on which all the study results are based.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kapesa, P., Bowa, K. The use of bladder voiding efficiency in assessing benign prostatic enlargement. Afr J Urol 28, 56 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-022-00319-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-022-00319-1

Keywords

  • Bladder voiding efficiency
  • International prostate severity score
  • Benign prostate enlargement
  • Bladder outflow obstruction and benign prostatic hyperplasia