Skip to main content

Scrotal reconstruction with pedicled gracilis muscle flap following Fournier’s gangrene: a case report and literature review

Abstract

Background

Fournier’s gangrene is an acute soft tissue necrotizing infection involving the perineum and the external genitalia which can result in a major loss of the scrotal wall with exposure of the testicles. Reconstruction of such major defect is quite challenging; the use of pedicled gracilis muscle flap helps to create an aesthetically acceptable scrotum with minimal donor site morbidity.

Case presentation

We described the case of a 60-year-old man with a large scrotal loss from Fournier’s gangrene following bladder outlet obstruction and perineal abscess. He had multiple debridement and reconstruction with pedicled left gracilis muscle flap with a good aesthetic and functional post-operative outcome. The major challenge encountered was the loss of the skin graft as a result of the retraction of the muscle flap due to too early ambulation; this can thus be avoided by adequate pre-operative counseling and enforcing bed rest.

Conclusions

The use of gracilis muscle flap in the reconstruction of large scrotal defect described in this report has the additional advantage of creating a pliable and soft feel like that of the original scrotum with minimal donor site morbidity.

Background

Fournier’s gangrene is an acute soft tissue necrotizing infection involving the perineum and the external genitalia, commonly occurring in men. It can result in a major loss of scrotal wall with exposure of the testicles [1]. Serial debridement is often required to remove all necrotic tissues, control the rapid spread of the infection and ensure a wound bed suitable for coverage [2]. Reconstruction of the scrotal and perineal region following a large defect is quite challenging [3]. The main objectives of scrotal reconstruction thus include creating a scrotum which is cosmetically acceptable, sensate and durable and restoring the psychological and social confidence of the patient [1].

Different methods have been used in the past to achieve soft tissue cover following Fournier’s gangrene; they are all, however, associated with their benefits and drawbacks. The burying of the testes in the thigh, though simpler has been associated with repeated trauma to the testes, testicular atrophy and unpleasant aesthetic appearance [4, 5]. The undermining of the remnant perineal skin has also been used with good results but it is limited to defects less than half of the scrotum [6]. The use of skin graft alone has also been widely embraced but it cannot be used solely for major scrotal loss, and it is thin and adheres to the testes, thus easily showing its outline and less cosmetically acceptable. As a result of the drawbacks of the above modalities, the coverage of major scrotal defects with flaps either as fasciocutaneous, musculocutaneous or muscle flaps are preferred for a better appearance and psychological outcome [5]. The use of gracilis muscle flap in the reconstruction of large scrotal defect described in this report has the additional advantage of creating a pliable and soft feel like that of the original scrotum with minimal donor site morbidity. In addition, the gracilis muscle is easily conformed to the shape of the testes during reconstruction unlike the fasciocutaneous flap, and it also sags moderately under gravity like the original scrotum with time. The aim of this present study is to report a case of scrotal reconstruction with gracilis muscle flap, to highlight the challenge(s) that can be associated with this flap and the various measures that can help to ameliorate them.

Case presentation

A 60-year-old male presented at the emergency room with inability to pass urine, painful lower abdominal swelling and scrotal swelling 4 days prior presentation. There were obstructive and irritative urinary symptoms, high grade fever and discharge of pus from multiple points in the perineum. He also had a history of poorly treated urethritis in the past but there were no other co-morbidities. Examination findings at presentation showed a middle aged man who was conscious but in painful distress, not pale but dehydrated. The scrotum was grossly edematous, and most part of the scrotal skin was necrotic with foul smelling brownish exudate; copious purulent exudate was also noticed from the perineal region. Digital rectal examination revealed that the prostate was not enlarged, and the rectum was filled with well-formed stool. The full blood count done showed neutrophilic leukocytosis with toxic granulations. The abdominopelvic ultrasound scan showed a normal sized prostate with smooth outline. He was not diabetic, and the HIV I and II tests were negative. He was resuscitated and had urethral catheterization to relieve the obstruction. Debridement and drainage of pus was done, and it was followed by daily dressing with honey and sitz bath. The clinical findings prior to reconstruction showed loss of more than three fourth of the scrotal skin, and the exposed testicles and cords were covered with granulation tissue with some necrotic tissue at the distal part (Fig. 1); there was also a perineal defect measuring 12X5cm.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The scrotal defect with exposed testicles at reconstruction

Four weeks into admission, under spinal anaesthesia, he had further debridement and scrotal reconstruction with pedicled left gracilis muscle flap and split thickness skin graft while secondary closure was also done for the perineal wound at the same sitting. Following debridement, the testicles were syndactylised using a vicryl 0 suture, and the remnant scrotal skin was mobilized (Fig. 2). A proximal-based gracilis muscle flap was raised from the left thigh using a skin incision placed 4-cm-posterior to an imaginary line drawn from the pubic tubercle to the medial femoral condyle with the hip abducted and externally rotated and the knee flexed (Fig. 3). The flap was taken through a subcutaneous tunnel and inset into the wound to cover the exposed testes (Figs. 4, 5). A fenestrated split thickness graft harvested from the anterior right thigh was then applied over the reconstructed scrotal sac. The donor site for the gracilis flap was closed directly in two layers with a drain left in situ (Fig. 6). Six days post-operative, the patient commenced ambulation contrary to instruction and had retraction of the gracilis muscle flap with 100% skin graft loss; he also had superficial dehiscence of part of the perineal wound (Fig. 7). The necrotic skin graft was debrided, and the patient was commenced on daily dressing with dilute honey. Eight days after, the residual scrotal defect was closed by advancing the muscle flap and closing the residual skin over it with a good post-operative outcome (Figs. 8, 9). The patient is currently being followed up at the plastic surgery and urology clinics.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The syndactilized testicles after debridement

Fig. 3
figure 3

The skin incision marking for the proposed gracilis muscle flap

Fig. 4
figure 4

The muscle flap before insetting

Fig. 5
figure 5

The muscle flap already inset into the wound

Fig. 6
figure 6

The fenestrated graft placed on the inset muscle flap

Fig. 7
figure 7

The necrotic skin graft following the retraction of the muscle flap

Fig. 8
figure 8

The edge of the retracted muscle following debridement

Fig. 9
figure 9

The reconstructed scrotum at follow-up

Discussion

Different methods have been tried in the coverage of scrotal defects resulting from Fournier’s gangrene. The most appropriate option used is usually based on the location and extent of the wound as well as the amount of viable tissue present. Reconstructing the scrotum is often an herculean task because of the precarious blood supply to the scrotal wall and the adjoining tissue following the gangrene [6]. The perineal bacterial flora, difficult immobilization of the repaired site, and the contour of the testes usually make scrotal coverage difficult [1]. Very large defects with deep cavities can be appropriately managed with the use of muscle or myocutaneous flaps like gracilis flap which was used in the index case [2, 3]. The gracilis muscle flap is a type II flap that is based majorly on the ascending branch of the medial circumflex femoral artery [2, 7].

In the index patient, the pedicled gracilis muscle flap was chosen because it was close to the scrotal area, and it is ideal for coverage of large scrotal defects with deep cavities. It also serves as a good recipient site for skin grafts, thus removing the risk of skin paddle necrosis which is associated with the myocutaneous flap. [5] On the other hand, the limitations of the gracilis muscle flaps include loss of muscle function at the donor area and the presence of an additional scar on the thigh. In this case report, scarring at the donor site was limited and acceptable to the patient, and there was no functional deficit in gait. Following scrotal reconstruction, wound infection can be a major challenge, in this report however, there was no major wound infection. In the case reported by Katusabe et al., half of the skin graft got necrosed following infection, but the gracilis muscle flap was unaffected [1]. In our report, however there was 100% skin graft loss, and it was due to retraction of the muscle following early mobilization of the patient against instruction. As a result of this, enforcing bed rest following surgery is very vital to ensure a good flap outcome. Furthermore, the donor site of this flap can also be closed primarily with little or no morbidity. In view of the above advantages, the gracilis muscle flap is a very good choice for covering large scrotal defect, and it will give an acceptable outcome if the highlighted pitfalls are avoided.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the pedicled gracilis muscle flap can be reliably used to cover large scrotal wounds especially those with deep cavities. It gives a durable coverage which is resistant to infection. It is easily elevated and inset into the defect because it is close to the scrotal area.

Availability of data and material

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Abbreviations

HIV:

Human Immunodeficiency Virus

References

  1. Katusabe LJ, Balumuka D, Hodges A (2013) Scrotal reconstruction with a pedicled gracilis muscle flap after debridement of Fournier’s gangrene: a case report. East Afr Med J 90(11):375–378

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim SW, Kim BJ, Seul CH (2006) Scrotal reconstruction using gracilis muscle flap in Fournier’s gangrene. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(4):152–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen SY, Fu JP, Chen TM, Chen SG (2011) Reconstruction of scrotal and perineal defects in Fournier’s gangrene. J plast Reconstr aesthet surg 64:528–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Islam MT, Dey PK, Kamal AHM, Uddin MF (2017) Evaluation of scrotal reconstruction with thigh flap. Bang Med J Khulna 50:13–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Karki D, Patel PK, Narayan RP (2016) Penoscrotal defect: a functional, esthetic, and psychological challenge. Plast Aesthet Res 3:64–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Karian LS, Chung SY, Lee ES (2015) Reconstruction of defects after Fournier’s Gangrene: a systematic review. E Plasty 15:155–169

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kayikcioglu A (2003) A new technique in scrotal reconstruction: short gracilis flap. Urology 61:1254–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the patient for giving consent for this publication and also all clinical staff that were involved in the management of the patient.

Funding

No external funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

IOS contributed to the conception, literature search, design of the work and final write-up DAA, PAA, OOO and UCO all contributed to the literature search, design of the work and final write-up. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oluwatosin Stephen Ilori.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The need for ethical approval was waived by LAUTECH Teaching Hospital Ethical Review Committee.

Consent for publication

Informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ilori, O.S., Onilede, D.A., Popoola, A.A. et al. Scrotal reconstruction with pedicled gracilis muscle flap following Fournier’s gangrene: a case report and literature review. Afr J Urol 27, 165 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-021-00268-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-021-00268-1

Keywords

  • Gracilis muscle flap
  • Fournier’s gangrene
  • Scrotal reconstruction