Skip to main content

Hypospadias treatment by tubulated pedicled preputial island flap according to the DUCKETT technique: single-center experience in sub-Saharan Africa

Abstract

Background

Hypospadias is the second most frequent congenital condition in boys after cryptorchidism, with an incidence of 0.3–0.7% compared to 2–4% for cryptorchidism. Since the 1980s, single-stage operations, such as the one described by Duckett, have been adopted by some authors. To assess the results of hypospadias surgery by tubed pedicled preputial island flap (DUCKETT’s procedure) in a West African reference hospital.

Methods

This is a retrospective and descriptive study that includes 41 patients with hypospadias who underwent DUCKETT procedure by a tubed pedicled preputial island flap during a period of 12 years. After penile degloving, the curvature has been corrected by skin bridging with or without Nesbit’s plication. The urethroplasty was done according to the DUCKETT procedure.

Results

The patients mean age was 11 ± 8.5 years. All of them had posterior foreskin and a ventral curvature of the penis. The urethral meatus was posterior in 37%. Six of them had a previous hypospadias repair. The complication rate was 58.5%. Wound infection and meatal stenosis occurred in 14.6% and 19.6% of cases, respectively. After a mean follow-up of 20 ± 9 months, total success, relative success and failure rates were 63%, 27% and 10%, respectively.

Conclusion

The DUCKETT procedure is associated with a high complication rate in our daily practice.

Background

Hypospadias is the second most frequent congenital condition in boys after cryptorchidism, with an incidence of 0.3–0.7% compared to 2–4% for cryptorchidism [1]. Surgery should be offered for all forms of hypospadias, but there is no consensus on the minimum age for the surgery. The results of this surgery pose a problem because of its many complications. Since the 1980s, single-stage operations, such as the one described by DUCKETT [2], have been adopted by some authors [3]. Surgery for hypospadias can be done in one or more operative stages. Each technique has its own advantages, but one-stage procedures are often associated with complications and require reoperations [4]. The complication rates were 20%—50% [4]. The debate over the optimal treatment for hypospadias is ongoing and most believe that a two-stage procedure offers superior functional and cosmetic results with fewer complications like the Bracka technique. These procedures seem to be more adapted in our developing countries where the cost of surgery remains inaccessible to the majority of the patients. A few studies have evaluated the results of DUCKETT’s procedure for hypospadias in our countries. The aim of this work was to evaluate the results of DUCKETT's pedicled prepucial flap procedure for hypospadias treatment in a reference hospital in West Africa.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of all hypospadias patients treated by the DUCKETT technique from January, 1st 2003 to December, 31st 2015. The patients were operated on by senior surgeons.

Surgical technique

All children were operated on under general anesthesia and the adults under spinal anesthesia. Antibiotic prophylaxis was systematic. The correction of the curvature started with an undressing of the penis, then resection of the fibrous tissues and an excision of the urethral plate. If necessary, a plication of the tunica albuginea on the opposite side to the curvature was carried out according to Nesbit [5]. Urethroplasty consisted in tubularizing a pedicled prepucial flap according to the DUCKETT technique [2]. A muco-cutaneous, transverse and posterior flap of the prepuce was kept integral with its subcutaneous tissue. Thus pedicled flap, was tubularized and tilted longitudinally anteriorly to form the missing urethral canal. The lower end was anastomosed to the hypospadic urethra, while the upper end created the new urethral meatus. This tubular flap was fixed in an orthotopic position at points, which were separated. As the meatus was to terminate at the top of the glans, the tube was tunneled distally to the glans before being anastomosed to the mucous membrane of the glans. One to two additional layers are placed on the neo-urethra, one of which constitutes the spongioplasty. The Duplay technique was associated with this in some patients. This consists in tubularizing the urethral plate on itself from the ectopic orifice to the top of the glans after an incision on either side of it. This association is made in the very posterior forms to reduce the length of the foreskin used. Slowly absorbable sutures (PDS™, Ethicon Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France) were used (4/0 or 5/0 in children, and 3/0 or 4/0 in adults). Figure 1 shows the different stages of the technique used. The duration of post-operative trans-urethral drainage was 10 days.

Fig. 1
figure 1

A Inverted U-shaped incision circumscribing the hypospade urethral meatus. B Penile degloving, excision of the fibrous tissue, and raising of the prepucial flap. C Rotation of the preputial pedicled flap after section of the urethral plate. D Tubulation of the preputial flap pedicled around a urinary catheter with meatoplasty and suture of the proximal end to the urethral tracheus. E Final appearance after skin closure

Evaluation of results

The occurrence of post-operative complications and the clinical results at the last check-up were evaluated. We defined total success as an apical meatus, a straight penis and a cosmetic aspect deemed satisfactory by the surgeon. Relative success was defined by the need for maintenance dilatations, the existence of residual curvature, or a poor cosmetic result considered by the surgeon. Failure was defined as total suture release and urethral stenosis without success at revision surgery. Unsatisfactory cosmetic appearance corresponded to unsightly healing of the penis. The acceptable residual curvature was defined as a curvature of less than 20˚ without a painful erection. Data entry and statistical analysis were carried out using Excel 2007 software (Microscoft, Redmond, WA, USA).

Results

Forty-one patients were included in our study with a mean age of 11 ± 8.5 years (extremes of 1.8 and 31 years). Hypospadias was anterior in 14 cases (34%), middle in 12 cases (29%), and posterior in 15 cases (36%). All patients had a ventral curvature of the penis. All patients selected for this technique had a posterior preputial apron. Six patients (14.6%) had a recurrent hypospadias. Excision of fibrous tissue with loosening of the penis associated with excision of the urethral plate was sufficient in 25 cases (61%) to correct the curvature. A plication of the tunica albuginea of corpora cavernosa was needed in 16 cases (39%). A Duplay procedure was added to the Duckett procedure in three patients (7.3%). Twenty-four patients (58.5%) had a complication. A wound infection and a neo-meatus stenosis were the most frequent complications (Table 1). Only seven patients were reoperated with a surgical revision rate of 17%. The three cases of total suture loosening had revision surgery 3 to 6 months later with only one case of success. The case of urethro-cutaneous fistula had a successful repair by excision of the fistulous tract and closure of the defect using interrupted sutures of the urethral and cutaneous planes. The six cases of meatus stenosis were treated by iterative dilation using HEGAR candles with satisfactory results. The two cases of proximal urethral stenosis were treated unsuccessfully with urethroplasty. The case of retraction of the neo-meatus was treated with an additional repair, according to Duplay alongside with a meatoplasty with a satisfactory evolution. Non-troublesome residual curvature and poor cosmetic results were simply monitored. At the last follow-up of 20 ± 9 months, the rates of total success, relative success and failure were 63% (26 cases), 27% (11 cases) and 10% (4 cases), respectively, after treatment of complications.

Table 1 Distribution according to the different complications

Discussion

Surgery is the standard treatment for hypospadias. It is a difficult surgery, with a multitude of techniques described. The posterior forms of hypospadias require the most complex techniques with a higher risk of complications [6. To improve the results, some authors opt for two-stage techniques [3, 7]. These would reduce the rate of infection and failure due to flap necrosis or suture disunion [3]. Zheng et al. [7] recommend two-stage urethroplasty in posterior forms with severe curvature after excision of the urethral plate, because they believe that this avoids the frequent urethral stenosis that occurs with single-stage urethroplasty. Bankole Sapin et al. [3] found a complication rate of 26% for two-stage surgery and 37% for one-stage surgery. However, the anesthetic risk and the additional financial costs generated by this technique are not negligible [8]. The Bracka technique is the most successful in this indication [8]. The choice of the DUCKETT's one-step technique [2] in our series was guided by the need to excise the urethral plate as part of the orthoplasty, the presence of a posterior preputial apron, but also because of the good mastery of the technique in our center. Added to this, the financial reasons and the problem of follow-up. For some authors [9], single-stage urethroplasty offers good results, especially for very young patients. While others, such as Bankole Sapin R et al. [3], believe that it is more likely to have complications. Complications of hypospadias surgery are particularly common in developing countries [3, 10]. Several factors may explain this phenomenon: the unavailability of adequate equipment (magnifying glasses, fine threads and microsurgical instruments in particular), the problem of post-operative care often entrusted to non-specialist nurses and the variability of the operators. Lower complication rates are noted by other authors, especially in Western countries [6, 11]. The main complications of hypospadias surgery reported in the literature are wound infection, flap necrosis, urethro-cutaneous fistula, and neo-urethral or neo-meatus stenosis [3, 10,11,12,13]. Wound infection was the most common early complication in this series, probably due to the poor conditions in which post-operative care was carried out, but also due to the hot and dry tropical climate. The use of two-stage surgery could in some cases minimize this complication rate. These infections are promoted to the failure of the repair by the sutures being loosened or by flap necrosis [14]. Flap necrosis can also be the consequence of poor dissection and devascularisation of the flap. Diallo et al. [10] reported 15% flap necrosis and suture disunion. No cases of flap necrosis were reported in this series. Urethro-cutaneous fistula was present in 2.4% of the cases in our series. Other authors reported varying frequencies ranging from 7.9% to 25% of cases depending on the series [3, 10, 11]. Prevention of this fistula can be achieved by interposing a secondary layer between the flap and the skin [15]. It is advisable to put in intermediate layers to minimize the risk of fistula [16]. The low rate of fistulas in this series may be due to this procedure being performed in most patients. The secondary treatment of this fistula is usually easy, but there is a risk of failure depending on the size of the fistula, the number of fistulas and the experience of the surgeon [14]. However, the age of the fistula, its location, and the length of the neo-urethra do not seem to influence the results [14]. Urethral stenosis is usually the result of devascularization of the stenotic area in the case of tension anastomosis, with a higher risk of wound infection [10]. The urethral stenosis rate is variable according to the literature. The rate was high in the series of Akbiyik et al. [12] who reported a 27.5% stenosis rate, while Mosharafa et al. [6] reported only 0.9% urethral meatus stenosis. Finally, the rate of unintrusive residual penile curvature (5%) was lower than that reported by Diallo et al. [10]. In total, the success rate of the DUCKETT technique was 63% after treatment of complications. The rate of good results depends, among other things, on the technique, the operator's experience, the type of hypospadias, and the presence and severity of the curvature [16]. Diallo et al. [10] in Guinea, after a 3–22 month follow-up, reported 61.7% good results for all techniques and all forms of hypospadias. While Diao et al. [13] in Senegal reported 62.5% good results for all previous forms of hypospadias, all techniques combined. Other, mainly western authors such as Dewan et al. [17] report better success rates with the Duckett technique after a single treatment (66.6% success rate out of 190 hypospadias treated). Similarly, Zheng et al. [15] reported only 24% complications after a first treatment with a pedicled preputial flap. According to them, the failure rate is higher with the Duckett procedure for recurrent hypospadias. The poor prognosis risk factors were advanced age at the time of surgery, the absence of an additional layer, and tissue fibrosis [15]. Lyu et al. [18], comparing the tubulated Duckett preputial flap with the untubulated Onlay patch flap, noted a higher rate of fistulas and stenosis with the DUCKETT procedure.

Conclusion

In our care context, the treatment of hypospadias with the DUCKETT technique gives encouraging results, but with a high complication rate. It is a complex surgery carried out in non-optimal conditions. Wound infection is a major problem. It is, therefore, necessary to improve aseptic conditions in the operating theater and during post-operative care, but also to train urologists in this specialized surgery.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

PDS:

Polydioxanone synthetic

References

  1. Boudaoud N, Pons M, Bouche Pillon Persyn MA, Lefebvre F, Poli Merol ML, Francois C (2016) Hypospadias. Ann Chir Plast Esthét. 61(5):439–449

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Duckett JW (1980) Transverse preputial island flap technique for repair of severe hypospadias. Urol Clin North Am 7(2):423–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bankole Sapin R, Nandiolo R, Yao B, Tam- bo F, Vodi L, Mobiot L (2007) Le traitement de l’hypospadias posterieur au CHU de Treichville (Abidjan). Prog Urol 17(4):860–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sadeghi A, Mirshemirani A, Khaleghnejadtabari A, Sadeghian N, Rozroukh M, Ghoroubi J et al (2017) Duckett versus modified Bracka technique for proximal hypospadias repair a 10-year experience. Iran J Pediatr 27(6):e7752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nesbit RM (1965) Congenital curvature of the phallus : report of three cases with description of corrective operation. J Urol 93:230–232

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mosharafa AA, Agbo-Panzo D, Priso R, Aubry E, Besson R (2009) Cure d’hypospadias. La forme de la plaque urétrale a-t-elle une influence sur le résultat de l’intervention de Duplay-Snodgrass? Prog Urol 19(7):510–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zheng DC, Yao HJ, Cai ZK, Da J, Chen Q, Chen YB et al (2015) Two stageurethroplastyis a betterchoicefor proximalhypospadias with chordee after urethralplate transection : a sigle center experience. Asian J Androl 17(1):94–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bhat A, Single M, Bhat M, Sabharwal K, Upadhay R, Kumar V (2015) Incised plate uretroplasty in perinéal and périnéo-scrotal hypospadias. Afr J Urol 21:105–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Moudouni S, Tazi K, Nouri M, Koutani A, Hachimi M, Lakrissa A (2001) Hypospadias in adults. Prog Urol 11(4):667–669

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Diallo AB, Bah I, Toure BM, Ouendeno LB, Balde I, Diallo MB (2008) L’hypospadias: aspects anatomo-cliniques et thérapeutiques au CHU de Conakry Guinée. Andrologie 18(2):131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Spinoit AF, Poelaert F, Groen LA, Van Laecke E, Hoebeke P (2013) Hypospadias repair at a tertiary care center: long-term followup is mandatory to determine the real complication rate. J Urol 189(6):2276–2281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Akbiyik F, Tiryaki T, Şenel E, Mambet E, Livanelioglu Z, Atayurt H (2009) Clinical experience in hypospadias: results of tubularized incised plate in 496 patients. Urology 73(6):1255–1257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Diao B, Fall PA, Ndoye AK, Diallo Y, Sow Y, Diabaté I et al (2006) Anterior hypospadias: one stage repair. Report of 40 cases. Dakar Med 51(3):151–154

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Han W, Zhang W, Sun N (2018) Risk factors for failed urethrocutaneous fistula repair after transverse prepucial island flap urethroplasty. Int Urol Nephrol 50(2):191–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zheng DC, Wang H, Lu MJ, Chen Q, Chen YB, Ren XM et al (2013) Acomparative study of the use ofa transverse preputial island flap (the Duckett technique)to treat primary and secondary hypospadias in older chinese patients with severe chordee. World J Urol 31(4):965–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cheng EY, Vemulapalli SN, Kropp BP, Pope JC, Furness PD, Kaplan WE, Smith DP (2002) Snodgrass hypospadias repair with vascuralized Dartos flap : the perfectrepairfor virgin cases of hypospadias. J urol 4(2):1723–1726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dewan PA, Dinneen MD, Winkle D, Duffy PG, Ransley PG (1991) Hypospadias : Duckett Pedicle Tube Urethroplasty. Eur Urol 20:39–42

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lyu Y, Yu L, Xie H, Huang Y, Li X, Sun L et al (2019) Comparison of short-term complications between Onlay and Duckett urethroplasty and the analysis of risk factors. Int Urol Nephrol 51(5):783–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank all the urology staff of the University Hospital Aristide Le Dantec in Dakar.

Funding

It is no source of funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MN, YS, AS, and AmT: data collection, article writing, validation of the version to be published. STF, NSN, BS, CZ-O, NAB, OS, AN, AbT, BF, BD, PAF, and AKN: data collection and patient care. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Modou Ndiaye.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethics committee of Hospital Aristide Le Dantec of Dakar, Senegal. This committee is made up of the head of the department and the other urology teachers. If the reference number is not applicable. Since it was a retroscopic review, consent was not required.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ndiaye, M., Sow, Y., Sarr, A. et al. Hypospadias treatment by tubulated pedicled preputial island flap according to the DUCKETT technique: single-center experience in sub-Saharan Africa. Afr J Urol 27, 156 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-021-00260-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-021-00260-9

Keywords

  • Hypospadias
  • Penile
  • Curvature
  • Preputial island flap
  • Duckett procedure