Skip to main content

Case Report: Mini-endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in an en-bloc kidney transplant

Abstract

Background

Overall incidence of stones in kidney transplant recipients is 1%. En-bloc kidney transplant is a rare anatomical condition in which kidney stones treatment can be extremely difficult to treat. As far as we know, no cases of staghorn calculi in en-bloc kidney transplant have been published so far.

Case presentation

A 27-year-old woman presented to the Emergency Department because of asthenia, adynamia and weight loss associated with lower urinary tract symptoms and subfebrile temperature. Ten years before, she had undergone an en-bloc kidney transplant because of end-stage renal disease secondary to perinatal asphyxia syndrome. One kidney was implanted capo-volta in the right iliac fossa and the other one in the right flank. NCCT scan showed incomplete staghorn calculi in the iliac fossa transplanted kidney. Besides, severe dilation of the native and the right flank transplanted kidney, due to two ureteral stones of 6 and 7 mm impacted in the uretero-ureteral anastomosis, was found. After hospital admission and under ceftriaxone prophylaxis, an attempt to perform primary RIRS following our COVID protocol was carried out. Nevertheless, we ended up placing a JJ stent because once the guidewire passed through the ureteral stones, purulent material came out from the ureteral orifice. She stayed 9 days in-hospital for management of postobstructive polyuria and was discharged with oral antibiotics. Three weeks afterward, we removed the stent and performed flexible ureteroscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy of the ureteral stones. In the same procedure, we performed Mini-ECIRS (21 French) previous ultrasound-guided upper pole puncture. Postoperative NCCT scan showed neither residual fragments nor operative complications.

Conclusion

This is the first clinical case reporting Mini-ECIRS in a patient with an en-bloc kidney transplant. This endourological approach seems to be a feasible, safe and effective approach to treat stones in this anatomically challenging condition.

Background

Overall incidence of kidney stones in kidney transplant recipients is 1% [1]. Despite its rarity, allograft lithiasis can result in significant morbidity and treatment of these patients can be particularly challenging. Due to ectopic location of the kidney allograft, bones of the pelvis may preclude visualization of stones and may also attenuate the effect of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). Moreover, ectopic ureterovesical implantation implies that retrograde approaches are often difficult or not feasible. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is therefore widely used for renal transplant lithiasis, but perinephric scarring can increase the difficulty of puncturing and tract dilation, increasing the risk of bleeding.

The aim of this report is to present a clinical case in which Mini-ECIRS (endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery) was successfully used for the treatment of ureteral and staghorn calculi in a patient with a history of en-bloc kidney transplant. To our knowledge, this would be the first reported case on Mini-ECIRS in such a challenging condition.

Case presentation

Clinical history and diagnosis

A 27-year-old woman presented to the Emergency Department complaining of asthenia, adynamia and weight loss associated with lower urinary tract symptoms and subfebrile temperature. Ten years before, she had undergone a pediatric en-bloc kidney transplant because of end-stage kidney disease secondary to perinatal asphyxia syndrome. Asphyxia can lead to multi-organ dysfunction and a redistribution of cardiac output to maintain cerebral, cardiac and adrenal perfusion while potentially compromising renal, gastrointestinal and skin perfusion as circulatory response.

One allograft was located in the right iliac fossa (upside-down implantation with ureteric anastomosis following Lich-Gregoir technique, violet in Fig. 1) and the other in the right flank (end-to-side uretero-ureteral anastomosis with native right kidney, blue and orange in Fig. 1). The en-bloc graft was made to rest on the right psoas muscle, and the graft vena cava was anastomosed terminolaterally to the recipient external iliac vein using 6–0 polypropylene suture. The graft aorta was also anastomosed terminolaterally to the right external iliac artery using 7–0 polypropylene suture.

Fig. 1
figure 1

CT reconstruction showing the patient’s native kidneys (orange), the right flank transplanted kidney (blue) and the right iliac fossa transplanted kidney (violet)

Our patient presented other comorbidities as well such as hypertension, asymptomatic, bilateral cataracts, intellectual disability, sensorineural hearing loss and Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome (WPW pattern or preexcitation consisting of a short PR interval and prolonged QRS with an initial slurring upstroke—“delta” wave—in the presence of sinus rhythm) with episodic palpitations and lightheadedness. Anthropometric features are : height 125 cm, weight 25 kg, BMI = 14.2. She reported 10 kg weight loss in the last 5 months due to depression symptoms associated with COVID-19 (coronavirus disease) quarantine. Her daily medication was: prednisone 4 mg, amlodipine 5 mg, atenolol 25 mg, enalapril 2.5 mg, mycophenolic acid 250 mg/250 mg and tacrolimus 2 mg/2 mg.

The main abnormalities in the laboratory data were white blood cells count 15,654/mm3, serum creatinine level 1 mg/dl (baseline: 0.6 mg/dl), lactate 3.6 mmol/l and pH 7.39.

Non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) scan showed staghorn calculi in the kidney allograft implanted in the right iliac fossa composed of at least 3 stones of 12.5 mm, 13.7 mm and 10 mm located in superior, medium and inferior calyx, respectively (530 Hounsfield Units) (Fig. 2). Moreover, both the right flank transplanted kidney and the right native kidney had severe pelvicalyceal dilation because of two ureteral stones of 6.7 mm and 5.9 mm impacted in the uretero-ureteral anastomosis (450 to 510 HU). Finally, a 7.2-mm stone was reported in the lower calyx of her right native kidney (457 HU).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Preoperative CT scan shows incomplete staghorn calculi in right iliac fossa transplanted kidney and right native and flank transplanted kidneys dilated by ureteral stone

Initial management consisted in hospital admission and empiric treatment with ceftriaxone. After 24 h of empiric ceftriaxone and following our COVID19 protocol, an attempt to perform primary URS of the ureteral stones was carried out. Nevertheless, once the guidewire (Sensor™ PTFE-Nitinol Guidewire with Hydrophilic Tip, Boston Scientific®) passed through the ureteral stones, purulent material came out from the ureteral meatus. Due to this finding, we decided to take an upper urinary tract urine sample for culture, place a double pig-tail stent and a bladder catheter, and stop the procedure. She stayed 9 days in-hospital for management of postobstructive polyuria and was discharged with oral antimicrobial agents (ciprofloxacin and fluconazole) and without the bladder catheter.

Surgical technique and operative results

Definitive operative treatment of urolithiasis was performed three weeks thereafter. The traditional lithotomy position, in this unprecedented patient, allowed both antegrade and retrograde access. After removing ureteral stent, semirigid ureteroscopy (8Fr, Richard Wolf, Germany®) and Holmium-YAG laser lithotripsy of the ureteral stones (120 W, Lumenis®) were carried out. Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) (Flex X2, Karl Storz®) was required to treat the stone located in the inferior calyx of the native kidney. Fragmentation of the stones was executed using these laser settings: 0.8 J and 10 Hz. Fragments were removed using a nitinol stone-retrieval frontal basket (NGage, Cook Medical®).

At the meantime, upper pole puncture of the right iliac fossa allograft was performed under ultrasound (US) guidance by a second endourologist. Endovision puncture was not attempted in order to protect the reusable flexible ureteroscope from an extreme proximal ureteral kinking loop (Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3
figure 3

A Right native (upper kidney) and right flank transplanted kidneys dilated due to ureteral stones impacted in the uretero-ureteral end-to-side anastomosis. B Open-end ureteral catheter ascended after catheterization of the ureteroneocystostomy. Upper pole puncture of the right iliac fossa transplanted kidney under ultrasound guidance. C Antegrade flexible nephroscopy assessing residual fragments after finishing the percutaneous procedure

Tract dilation was accomplished using one-shot dilator to establish a 21-Fr working channel over the guidewire. Mini-PNL (MIP Storz 12 Fr Nephroscope ®) was performed with Holmium-YAG laser dusting of the stones (settings: 0.5 J and 50 Hz). Stone fragments and dust were flushed out through the sheath by vortex effect. After most of the stone fragments had been removed, antegrade flexible nephroscopy (Flexible Fiber-Cystoscope 15Fr, Richard Wolf, Germany®) was conducted to search for residual stones in locations that were inaccessible with the rigid nephroscope (Fig. 3C). A 14-Fr 100% silicon nephrostomy tube and a bladder catheter were left in place. Operating time was 120 min. Estimated blood loss was approximately 50 cc.

Postoperative NCCT scan, performed 12 h postoperatively, showed neither residual fragments nor suggestive signs of immediate postoperative complications (Fig. 4). Both the nephrostomy and the bladder catheter were removed the following day. The patient remained in hospital for 3 days because of tacrolimus blood levels fluctuation. Neither early nor late onset postoperative complications occurred.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Postoperative CT scan without neither residual fragments nor subcapsular hematoma

After 10 months from discharge, the patient remains stone-free. She is now under magnesium supplement and nitrofurantoin 100 mg daily prophylaxis since crystallographic analysis showed ammonium magnesium phosphate as the main component of the stones. Every six months ultrasound will be performed as follow-up.

Literature review

En-bloc transplantation of pediatric kidneys into adult recipients (EBKT) is considered a useful strategy to increase the donor pool. Many recent studies on EBKT have documented both good short-term and long-term outcomes [2].

According to a recent meta-analysis, incidence of stones in kidney transplant recipients is 1%, much lower than in the general adult populations. This may be due to protective factors such as lower glomerular filtration rates than healthy populations or the absence of tubulointerstitial defects in kidney allografts. It can also be explained by underdiagnosis, since renal denervation makes ureteral colic a symptom unlikely to happen [1]. The latter can increase the risk of diagnostic delay until patients develop fever or acute renal failure, leading to significant morbidity and increasing the risk of allograft dysfunction.

As well as in the general population, calcium-based (calcium oxalate and calcium phosphate) stones are the most frequent type in kidney transplant recipients. Interestingly, however, struvite stones are more common in these patients [1]. Rendering stone-free is one of the main objectives when dealing with infectious stones. High oral water intake, antibiotics prophylaxis and a strict follow-up are a must to prevent new formation.

According to the latest European Association of Urology guidelines, selecting the appropriate technique for stone removal in a transplanted kidney is difficult, although management principles are similar to those applied in other single renal units. Additional factors such as transplant function, coagulative status and anatomical obstacles due to the iliacal position of the organ directly influence the surgical strategy. In a recently published article describing over 30 years of experience on the management of graft stones after renal transplantation, the most frequently used treatment modality was ESWL (43.1%), followed by active surveillance (25.4%), retrograde URS (17.6%), antegrade URS (3.9%), PCNL (3.9%), open approach with ureteral reimplantation for primary stricture (3.9%) and urine alkalization (2%) [3].

Whenever technically possible, mini-percutaneous access should be of choice in these patients. This technique provides a high stone resolution rate and a fast recovery with less parenchymal injury and limited impact on allograft function compared to standard PNL [4]. Nevertheless, when treating complex cases of renal stones with abnormal anatomy it is helpful to use combined endoscopic approaches. In fact, ECIRS standardizes the combined antegrade and retrograde approach to large and/or complex urolithiasis, using both rigid and flexible scopes [5]. In this procedure, postoperative complications are diminished by reducing the number of required percutaneous tracts, decreasing bleeding risk and lowering intrarenal pressure. Single step stone-free is also more likely compared to PNL or RIRS alone, implying less economic burden and better patients’ quality of life.

We believed the best approach for our patient was to combine a miniaturized access, to diminish the risk of complications, with retrograde and antegrade approach using flexible scopes, in order to increase stone-free rate. We performed renal puncture under US guidance so as to reduce radiation exposure. Besides, US helps to achieve a perfect transpapillary puncture when contrast cannot show the pelvicalyceal configuration such as in cases of staghorn calculi.

Conclusion

Mini-ECIRS seems to be a feasible, safe and effective approach to treat stones in anatomically challenging conditions such as in EBKT patients.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

BMI:

Body mass index

COVID-19:

Coronavirus disease

ECIRS:

Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery

ESWL:

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

NCCT:

Non-contrast computed tomography

PNL:

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy

RIRS:

Retrograde intrarenal surgery

US:

Ultrasound

References

  1. Cheungpasitporn W, Thongprayoon C, Mao MA, Kittanamongkolchai W, Jaffer Sathick IJ, Dhondup T et al (2016) Incidence of kidney stones in kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Transplant 6:790–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sureshkumar KK, Habbach A, Tang A, Chopra B (2018) Long-term outcomes of pediatric en bloc compared to living donor kidney transplantation: a single-center experience with 25 years follow-up. Transplantation 102:e245–e248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Emiliani E, Subiela JD, Regis F, Angerri O, Palou J (2018) Over 30-yr experience on the management of graft stones after renal transplantation. Eur Urol Focus 4(2):169–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ji ZG, Tian Y, Chen YQ, Liu Z, Lin J, Wang JM et al (2013) A retrospective study of minipercutaneous laser lithotripsy for treatment of allograft kidney lithiasis obstruction. Transplant Proc 45:3298–3301

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cracco CM, Scoffone CM (2020) Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS)—tips and tricks to improve outcomes: a systematic review. Turk J Urol 46:S46-57

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Tobia Ignacio MD for revising our case report and Daels Pedro MD for inspiring us to push limits in our daily endourology practice.

Funding

No funding received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Case conception and design: DS, CC, MSG. Acquisition of data DS, JCS, FIT. Analysis and/or interpretation of data: DS, CC, JCS, JM. Drafting the article: DS, JCS, FT. Images design: PAG. Revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors contributed to the final approval of the version to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diego Santillán.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of our institutional review board with the 1964 Helsinki declaration. The institutional review board-approved protocol number is: PRIISA (Plataforma de Registro Informatizado de Investigaciones en Salud de Buenos Aires) #1617 and CEPI (Comité de Ética de Protocolos de Investigación) #5622. Consent for this surgery was obtained from the patient and her father.

Consent for publication

Consent for publication of this report was obtained from the patient and her brother.

Competing interests

No competing financial interests exist.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santillán, D., Scherñuk Schroh, J.C., Gutierrez, P.A. et al. Case Report: Mini-endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in an en-bloc kidney transplant. Afr J Urol 27, 147 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-021-00249-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-021-00249-4

Keywords

  • Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery
  • Kidney calculi
  • Ureteral access sheath
  • Endourology