Skip to main content

Urethral meatus preserving ventral onlay augmentation urethroplasty for female urethral stricture: our technique with initial experience

Abstract

Background

Female urethral stricture (FUS) is an uncommon cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in women. Reconstructive techniques are being increasingly used for strictures resistant to the more conservative form of management. Most forms of reconstruction require cutting open of urethral meatus, thereby resulting in some loss of the meatus function. We hereby describe the technique of urethral meatus sparing ventral onlay mucosal graft augmentation urethroplasty with our initial experience.

Methods

We performed this procedure in 10 cases of FUS with normal meatus and prospectively studied the outcomes over a period of 6 months follow-up.

Results

There was 90 percent success rate with one recurrence. The mean Qmax increased from 7.2 to 19.5 ml/s, mean post-void residual urine (PVRU) decreased from 96.5 to 22.7 ml and the mean IPSS decreased from 26.1 to 5.7. There were no major complications noted and the patients demonstrated significant subjective and objective improvement of symptoms in the follow-up period.

Conclusion

The technique of meatus sparing ventral onlay augmentation graft urethroplasty is a promising approach with good outcomes, is reproducible and has minimal complication rate.

Background

Female urethral stricture (FUS) is an uncommon cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in women [1,2,3,4,5]. The management strategies for it are still under a process of constant refinement and evolution. Strictures refractory to more conservative forms of treatment such as repeated urethral dilatations are now being increasingly managed by surgical reconstructive techniques [6, 7]. A variety of surgical reconstructive approaches have been described with most of them including the use of grafts to augment the stricture site [8,9,10,11,12].

The two main approaches for augmentation urethroplasty are the dorsal (anterior wall) onlay and the ventral (posterior wall) onlay. Ventral onlay graft urethroplasty in FUS has been used less due to theoretical risk of urethrovaginal fistula. This approach has potential advantages such as avoidance of dissection around dorsal neurovascular bundle and dorsal sphincter complex, operating in a relatively avascular field and familiarity to urogynecologists [13, 14]. Potential disadvantages are theoretical possibility of urethrovaginal fistulae, creation of hypospadiac meatus (when meatus is not preserved) [14, 15]. While the increased risk of urethrovaginal fistula has not been substantiated, the meatus can very well be preserved in the majority of cases of FUS. We describe this technique of urethral meatus sparing ventral onlay graft augmentation urethroplasty in FUS with our initial experience.

Methods

The study was approved by the institution ethics board and conforms to principles of declaration of Helsinki. All patients provided written informed consent along with guarantees of confidentiality.

Patient selection

Ten consecutive female patients with diagnosed FUS with normal urethral meatus were included in the study, performed between September 2017 and October 2019. Uroflowmetry, Micturating Cystogram (MCU) and Urodynamic testing (UDS) were done in all cases to document bladder outlet obstruction. A preoperative urethroscopy with 6 Fr ureteroscope was done to document normal meatus and location and extent of urethral stricture (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Flow of the study. AUA (American Urology Association Symptom Score), FSFI (Female Sexual Function Index), SD (Standard Deviation), PVR (Post void residual volume), MCU(Micturating cystourethrogram), UDS (Urodynamic study)

Surgical technique

The procedure was performed under regional or general anaesthesia depending on the choice of graft (vaginal or buccal mucosa). We used buccal or vaginal mucosal graft for the purpose of reconstruction, depending on the state of buccal and vaginal mucosa, history of tobacco chewing and patient preference. Vaginal douching (5% povidone-iodine solution) or chlorhexidine gargles were started one night prior to surgery. The procedure was performed in the standard lithotomy with 20-degree Trendelenburg. An intra-operative urethroscopy was performed with a 6 Fr ureteroscope, taking care not to dilate the stricture site, before passing a guidewire across the stricture. Urethra was approached through an inverted U-shaped incision made in the anterior vaginal wall with apex of ‘U’ near urethral meatus and base till bladder neck. Anterior vaginal wall flap including only the vaginal mucosa was developed to access ventral aspect of urethra. A transverse incision was then given on paraurethral tissue near urethral meatus and proximal paraurethral tissue flaps were raised to expose the ventral urethra. This layer was later used for quilting of graft and providing secure closure avoiding an overlapping suture line. With 14 French catheter in distal urethra as guide, ventral urethra was opened at distal end of stricture and extended proximally till healthy mucosa which could easily admit a 30 French dilator. The meatus was thus preserved in all cases where it was not involved. Three polyglactin 5–0 stay sutures were placed at the proximal healthy mucosa for easier subsequent placement of mucosal graft and a cystoscope confirmed adequacy of stricturotomy. A vagina or buccal mucosa of sufficient length and width corresponding to the stricturotomy was harvested. Our aim was to augment urethra to 30 Fr. For harvesting of vaginal graft, saline was injected submucosally in the posterolateral wall of vagina after marking the mucosa as per the required graft size. The underlying defect was sutured primarily with absorbable sutures after proper haemostasis. The buccal graft harvest site, when utilized, was left open to heal secondarily. Graft was de-fattened prior to its application. Meshing of graft was generally not required. The mucosal graft was now placed (with mucosal side making urethral lumen) and sutured to the opened urethral mucosa by making use of three preplaced polyglactin 5–0 sutures on proximal urethra by interrupted or continuous sutures and thus completing the closure on both sides sequentially. A 14/16 Fr catheter was then placed. Paraurethral tissue flap closure was done transversely over the urethra by continuous vicryl 4–0 suture. Each suture took paraurethral tissue flap on either side and graft tissue medially, thus doing external quilting of mucosal graft to paraurethral tissue layer. Anterior vaginal wall was closed by continuous vicryl 3–0 suture. Martius flap was placed between the paraurethral tissues and vaginal flap to ensure better soft tissue support, where vaginal mucosa was atrophic. A vaginal pack was then placed (Figs. 2,3).

Fig. 2
figure2

Schematic depiction of technique a inverted U Incision, b incision of ventral strictured urethra and Graft harvest from posterolateral vaginal wall, c Graft placement and anastomosis [With permission from Goel H.K., Katiyar V., Gunavanthe V. (2021). Figure 15.1, 15,4, 15.5. Ventral (Posterior) Onlay Augmentation Urethroplasty for Female Urethral Stricture. In: Khattar N., Nayyar R., Panda A. (eds) Female Bladder Outlet Obstruction and Urethral Reconstruction. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8521-0_15]

Fig. 3
figure3

intraoperative pictures, a inverted U Incision on anterior vaginal wall b development of paraurethral flaps, c incision of ventral surface of strictured urethra, d Graft harvest, e Graft placement and anastomosis, f Completion of graft anastomosis, g Paraurethral tissue flap closure, h Anterior vaginal wall flap closure

Post-op care and follow-up

Vaginal pack was removed next morning and patient discharged on catheter on second postoperative day. Catheter was removed on postoperative day 21. Patients were asked to maintain perineal hygiene and avoid sexual intercourse for 3 months.

Patients were followed up by symptom assessment (IPSS) and uroflowmetry at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months post-surgery. Patient developing recurrence of symptoms or poor urine flow parameters was evaluated for recurrence of stricture. Sexual function by female sexual function index (FSFI) was also noted preoperatively and at 6 months.

Statistical analysis was done using Mann–Whitney U test; chi-square test; Wilcoxon singed-rank test.

Results

The preoperative parameters as well as postoperative outcomes in our series of 10 patients who underwent meatus sparing urethroplasty is given in Table 1. The average age of patients in our series was 48 ± 10.80 years (range 35–63). The average length of stricture was 1.7 ± 0.67 cm (range 0.5–3 cm). The mean duration of surgery was 69.5 ± 12.35 min (range 55–90 min). We used buccal graft in seven of the patients and vaginal graft in three patients. Patients were discharged by postoperative day three and catheter was removed three weeks post-surgery in all of patients. We did not perform a routine peri-catheter RGU before catheter removal.

Table 1 Comparison of preoperative and postoperative values of Qmax, PVRU, AUA symptom scores and FSFI scores. Qmax (Peak Flow Rate), PVRU (Post-void Residual Urine), AUA (American Urology Association Symptom Score), FSFI (Female Sexual Function Index), SD (Standard Deviation)

Patients were subsequently followed up on outpatient basis with symptom scores and uroflowmetry with PVRU assessment. Figure 4 depicts the preoperative and postoperative uroflowmetry of the subject. We did not perform routine follow-up MCU or UDS in patient as long as they were asymptomatic with a non-obstructive uroflow.

Fig. 4
figure4

Preoperative (a) & postoperative (b) uroflowmetry of the patient

None of the patient presented with any postoperative dyspareunia or new onset sexual dysfunction. There was a mean improvement in FSFI scores of about four points over baseline which was sustained throughout the follow of period of 6 months. There were no significant intraoperative or postoperative complications. None of the patients developed any de novo stress urinary incontinence. There was no incidence of local infection or urethrovaginal fistula.

One patient developed recurrence and presented with voiding LUTS along with poor flow rate (11 ml/s) and high PVR (50 ml) at 2 months post-surgery. She was subjected to urethroscopy and diagnosed with recurrent short segment narrowing of urethral lumen at proximal anastomotic junction of urethral mucosa and the grafted mucosa. She was managed with internal urethrotomy and kept on self-calibration.

Discussion

FUS as a cause of female LUTS is an uncommon diagnosis and has long been under-recognized and under-treated. Most clinicians resort to repeated urethral dilatations which provide temporary relief at best [16,17,18]. Augmentation urethroplasty is increasingly being considered as the preferred modality of recurrent FUS management. Many approaches for augmentation urethroplasty have been described, including the use of variety of flaps and grafts as inlay or onlay, in both dorsal and ventral placement [12, 13]. Mucosal grafts are a good substitute for urethral mucosa, as they are built to survive in moist conditions, are resistant to infections and can be easily harvested. Buccal mucosa is our graft of choice in most conditions, as it is reported to give excellent results [15]. However, in patients with history of tobacco consumption or otherwise poor quality buccal mucosa or owing to patient preference, a vaginal graft provides a good source of tissue in ample quantities.

Amongst the two basic approaches, that is the dorsal and ventral, the ventral approach is by far more familiar to most urologists, as this is the plane in which most surgeons usually perform most uro-gynaecological procedures. It provides practical advantages of good visual exposure throughout the procedure with ease of dissection and stricture visualization. The theoretical advantages of the approach being avoidance of dissection near the neurovascular bundle, hence limiting chances of postoperative sexual dysfunction as well as intraoperative bleeding. The disadvantages of the ventral approach are the theoretically higher risk of urethrovaginal fistulas and the bothersome posteriorly directed and splayed urinary stream due to the resultant hypospadiatic meatus. As most of the strictures do not extend to meatus, we believe a meatus sparing approach to urethroplasty can be utilized in the majority of the cases and hence help avoid the major problem associated with ventral urethroplasty. The wide exposure provided by the ventral approach to urethra greatly facilitates meatal preservation. Analogous to the well-established principals of male urethral reconstruction, where meatal preservation is done as far as possible, the reproduction of the same principles in female urethral reconstruction should yield favourable results. While a higher risk of urethrovaginal fistulas has not been noted in the ventral approach [13], the problem of a hypospadiatic meatus can be dealt with in these majority of the patients with such a meatus sparing approach. Contemporary series on female urethroplasty utilizing dorsal and ventral onlay graft augmentation techniques report high success rates varying between 85 and 95% [7, 9, 12, 15, 19]. Our study notes a similar high success rate (90%) and good functional outcomes with the use of meatus preservation technique.

Ozlulerden et al. [19] recently published an article detailing their technique of ventral augmentation urethroplasty in FUS. They retrospectively studied six cases and described their technique of placing a buccal graft in a ventral onlay manner after accessing the urethra via an inverted U-shaped vaginal flap. Our technique follows the initial same basic approach to urethral stricture, with the key departure in our technique being our meatal sparing in cases of strictures which do not extend till the meatus. This obviates the need of a meatoplasty and avoids the stream-related complications postoperatively. They reported a 100% success rate for a median follow-up of 23 months. We had a similar high success rate of 90% in our study using a larger sample size with a relatively smaller follow-up.

We have also utilized the female sexual function index (FSFI), a 19 question-based self-reported questionnaire to evaluate the various aspects of the female sexual function, to study the sexual function in patients pre- and post-operatively. The preoperative FSFI score of 12.6 showed a substantial improvement to 17.1 postoperatively at 6 month follow-up. There was no sexual dysfunction in any of the patients, with no development of dyspareunia, sensory abnormality or any other related complaint. This improvement of FSFI of about four points over the preoperative baseline could be due to resolution of inflammation of urethra as flows normalize. Manasa et al. [20] in their series similarly studied sexual function preoperative and post-operatively with the help of the FSFI questionnaire after dorsal onlay mucosal graft urethroplasty in 13 patients of urethral stricture. They reported improvement in sexual function in all cases of successful repair in contradiction to the theoretically held belief of a potential sexual dysfunction secondary to possible iatrogenic injury to the dorsal neurovascular bundle with the dorsal approach. We found a similar trend towards definite improvement in sexual function post-urethroplasty in all our patients.

Conclusion

Exact incidence of FUS is unknown but it is definitely ignored and undertreated. Repeated urethral dilatations is not always the right strategy for FUS. Our technique of meatal sparing ventral onlay mucosal graft augmentation urethroplasty yields good outcomes with a high success rate (90%), low recurrence and low complication rates with minimal morbidity. Its key advantage of preservation of meatus and its functions support a strong consideration for utilization of our meatus preservation technique of urethroplasty and avoiding unnecessary sacrifice of the meatus in the vast majority of urethral stricture cases. The advantages of meatus preservation need to be further validated in studies involving direct comparison between different techniques of reconstruction.

Availability of data and material

All data pertaining to study are available with the author and would be provided on request.

Abbreviations

FUS:

Female urethral stricture

LUTS:

Lower urinary tract symptoms

Qmax:

Maximal flow rate

AUA:

American urology association symptom score

FSFI:

Female sexual function index

USG:

Ultrasonography

MCU:

Micturating cystourethrogram

UDS:

Urodynamic study

PVR:

Post void residual volume

References

  1. 1.

    Malde S, Solomon E, Ockrim JL et al (2015) Female bladder outflow obstruction: an increasing but under-diagnosed phenomenon. Eur Urol Sup 14:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Carr LK, Webster GD (1996) Bladder outlet obstruction in women. Urol Clin North Am 23:385–391

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Spilotros M, Malde S, Solomon E et al (2017) Female urethral stricture: a contemporary series. World J Urol 35:991–995

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Groutz A, Blaivas JG, Chaikin DC (2000) Bladder outlet obstruction in women: definition and characteristics. Neurourol Urodyn 19:213–220

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kuo HC (2005) Videourodynamic characteristics and lower urinary tract symptoms of female bladder outlet obstruction. Urology 66:1005–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Blaivas JG, Santos JA, Tsui JF et al (2012) Management of urethral stricture in women. J Urol 188:1778–1782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Smith AL, Ferlise VJ, Rovner ES (2006) Female urethral strictures: successful management with long-term clean intermittent catheterization after urethral dilatation. BJU Int 98:96–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Tanello M, Frego E, Simeone C, Cosciani Cunico S (2002) Use of pedicle flap from the labia minora for the repair of female urethral strictures. Urol Int 69:95–98

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kowalik C, Stoffel JT, Zinman L, Vanni AJ, Buckley JC (2014) Intermediate outcomes after female urethral reconstruction: graft vs flap. Urology 83:1181–1185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Osman NI, Mangera A, Chapple CR (2013) A systematic review of surgical techniques used in the treatment of female urethral stricture. Eur Urol 64:965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Osman NI, Chapple CR (2015) Contemporary surgical management of female urethral stricture disease. Curr Opin Urol 25:341–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Migliari R, Leone P, Berdondini E, De Angelis M, Barbagli G, Palminteri E (2006) Dorsal buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty for female urethral strictures. J Urol 176:1473–1476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Gozzi C, Roosen A, Bastian PJ, Karl A, Steif C, Tritschler S (2011) Volar onlay urethroplasty for reconstruction of female urethra in recurrent stricture disease. BJU Int 107:1964–1966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Colleselli K, Stenzl A, Eder R, Strasser H, Poissel S, Bartsch G (1998) The female urethral sphincter: a morphological and topographical study. J Urol 160:49–54

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Sharma GK, Pandey A, Bansal H et al (2010) Dorsal onlay lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty for urethral strictures in women. BJU Int 105(9):1309–1312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Defreitas GA, Zimmern PE, Lemack GE, Shariat SF (2004) Refining diagnosis of anatomic female bladder outlet obstruction: comparison of pressure-flow study parameters in clinically obstructed women with those of normal controls. Urology 64:675–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Santucci RA, Payne CK, Anger JT, Saigal CS (2008) Office dilation of the female urethra: a quality of care problem in the field of urology. J Urol 180:2068–2075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Schwender CE, Ng L, McGuire E, Gormley EA (2006) Technique and results of urethroplasty for female stricture disease. J Urol 175:976–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Yusuf O, Sinan C, Ali Z, Zafer A (2020) Female buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty: a new modified ventral onlay “AZ” technique. Int Urogynecol J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04354-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Manasa T, Khattar N, Tripathi M, Varshney A, Goel H, Sood R (2019) Dorsal onlay graft urethroplasty for female urethral stricture improves sexual function: Short-term results of a prospective study using vaginal graft. Indian J Urol 35:267–272

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have contributed significantly to the manuscript. All authors read and approve the final manuscript. VKK made significant contribution to conception, acquisition of data, analysis, drafting the work. RS made significant contribution to conception and drafting the work. AS made significant contribution to conception, acquisition, analysis, drafting the work. HKG made significant contribution to conception, acquisition, analysis, drafting the work. NK made significant contribution to conception, analysis, drafting the work. VG made significant contribution to conception, acquisition, drafting the work. All authors read and approve the final manuscript and to any substantially modified version that involves the author's contribution to the study, and agree both to be personally accountable for the author's own contributions and ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work, even ones in which the author was not personally involved, are appropriately investigated, resolved, and the resolution documented in the literature.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hemant Kumar Goel.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to publish

The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee (“Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Institutional Ethics Committee” belonging to ABVIMS & Dr RML Hospital), Ethics approval number: IEC/PGIMER/RMLH/2096. All patients provided written informed consent along with guarantees of confidentiality.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent to participate and for publishing of study was obtained from all participants.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Katiyar, V.K., Sood, R., Singla, A. et al. Urethral meatus preserving ventral onlay augmentation urethroplasty for female urethral stricture: our technique with initial experience. Afr J Urol 27, 127 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-021-00231-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Ventral onlay
  • Meatus sparing
  • Female urethral stricture
  • Augmentation urethroplasty
  • Substitution urethroplasty