Skip to main content

Impact of oxidative stress on semen parameters in normozoospermic infertile men: a case–control study

Abstract

Background

Oxidative stress has been implicated in male infertility through decrease in sperm quality. However, men with normal semen parameters (normozoospermia) may be unable to fertilize their partners even when they have normal sperm function. Thus, they would be considered infertile. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of unexplained male infertility.

Methods

In this case–control study, infertile men with normozoospermia (n = 46) and fertile control group (n = 21) underwent seminal fluid analyses according to WHO 2010 criteria. Serum and seminal plasma levels of total antioxidant capacity (TAC), glutathione, malondialdehyde, uric acid and albumin were also measured using colorimetric methods.

Results

The level of total antioxidant capacity in both serum and seminal plasma was significantly lower in normozoospermic infertile men in comparison with fertile group (p < 0.0001). However, no significant differences were observed in serum and seminal plasma levels of glutathione, uric acid, albumin and malondialdehyde between infertile and fertile groups.

Conclusion

Low TAC level induces oxidative stress and consequently causes sperm dysfunction and male infertility. Estimation of TAC can be a useful tool in the diagnosis of male infertility. Antioxidant supplementation should be considered in the treatment of oxidative stress-induced male infertility.

Background

Medical concern in infertility has increased recently due to the decrease in the reproduction capability of couples worldwide [1]. Male reproductive defects contribute to nearly 50% of all infertility issues. Male infertility has been attributed to deteriorated sperm number or function [2]. Sperm dysfunction has been linked to varicocele, cryptorchidism, hypogonadism, testicular cancer, urogenital tract infections, systemic diseases and genetic factors [3]. However, in nearly 25% of male infertility cases, men have demonstrated normal sperm parameters but still unable to father a child, which is termed unexplained infertility [4].

Oxidative stress (OS) has been involved in unexplained male infertility, and contemporary parameters have introduced OS as markers in the identification of potential causes of male infertility. OS is a state of imbalance between production and removal of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [5]. Antioxidants are compounds capable of scavenging and inhibiting the formation of ROS [6]. ROS have critical rule in male reproductive function, and these active molecules are required in small quantities for normal sperm function [7], while high quantities could decrease semen quality and impair sperm fertilization capability [8]. Hence, antioxidants are critical to inactivate ROS continuously to maintain only the small amount required to normal sperm function [9].

Recently, there is growing evidence suggesting that oxidative stress is involved in many aspects of male infertility and antioxidants counteract the adverse effects of OS on male fertility potential [10]. Antioxidants in seminal fluid can be classified into two forms: enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants. Low seminal plasma antioxidants have been found to be implicated in reducing sperm concentration, motility and morphology [11]. Total antioxidant capacity (TAC) has shown to be strongly correlated with semen quality [12]. Similarly, glutathione has a role in ROS detoxification and protection of sperm plasma membrane [13]. Uric acid protects sperm viability and enhances sperm motility through stabilizing of ascorbic acid and scavenging of ROS [14, 15]. Albumin protects the spermatozoa against lipid peroxidation and prevents loss of sperm motility [16]. Malondialdehyde (MDA) is an index of lipid peroxidation; it is negatively correlated with sperm count, motility and morphology [17].

The aim of this study is to investigate the role oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of unexplained male infertility through estimation of semen and serum levels of TAC, glutathione, MDA, uric acid and albumin in normozoospermic infertile men.

Methods

This study was approved by ethical committee of university of Garmian (EC-G/191). Semen and serum samples were obtained from normozoospermic men after they were asked to fill consent form, during the period (March to November, 2017). A total of 64 subjects were included in this study, 42 infertile men with mean age (32.5 ± 6.3) years, and 22 fertile men with mean age (33.9 ± 7.2) years. Exclusion criteria for selection of subjects were: (1) smoking, (2) alcohol consumption, (3) abnormal BMI, (4) taking antioxidant medications, (5) etiologies related to physiological abnormality, such as varicocele, obstruction or small testicular volume and (6) having partner with low reproductive potential. Infertile men were attended to fertility clinics at Kalar city for infertility evaluation. Fertile men who had at least 1 child were enrolled in the study. Based on basic semen analysis results of infertile men, only participants with normal seminal fluid analysis were included in this study.

Semen collection and analysis

Semen samples were obtained from patients and control group either by masturbation in the clinic or at home (delivered within 30 min) after 3–4 days of sexual abstinence. Basic semen analyses were performed after liquefaction following the WHO 2010 manual. Samples from different laboratories were reanalyzed at our laboratory and performed by the same investigator after exactly 60 min for the sake of data consistency.

Blood collection

Along with semen sample collection, subjects were asked for venous blood sample. Blood samples were collected by venipuncture into plastic vacutainer tube, and then, sera were separated and transferred to different tubes and stored in deep freeze (− 45 °C) for further analyses of oxidative stress markers.

Estimation of total antioxidant capacity

TAC was estimated using a colorimetric kit (Cell Biolabs, San Diego, CA, USA). The assay was based on the reduction of copper (II) to copper (I) by antioxidants and formation of a brown color with maximum absorbance at 490 nm. The absorbance of the samples was compared with a known uric acid standard curve. Absorbance values were proportional to the samples total antioxidant capacity.

Estimation of glutathione

Glutathione was estimated using a method by Moron et al. The solution was incubated with 0.1 ml (10 mM DTNB) and 10 µl of 10% TCA at room temperature for 5 min. The optical density of the yellow color complex was measured at 412 nm. The concentration was calculated by plotting on glutathione standard curve [18].

Estimation of uric acid

Uric acid was estimated using a colorimetric kit (Biolabo, Maizy, France). 20 µl of seminal plasma was added to 1.0 ml of uric acid reagent and incubated at 37° for 5 min. The developed color was read at 520 nm. Concentrations were calculated and expressed as mmol/ml.

Estimation of albumin

Albumin was estimated using a colorimetric kit (Biolabo, Maizy, France) at pH (4.3). Albumin binds to the BCG to form a BCG–albumin complex. The resulted green complex absorbed light at 630 nm, and it was directly proportional to the concentration of albumin in the sample.

Estimation of malondialdehyde (MDA)

MDA was measured by the reaction with thiobarbituric acid (TBA). Sample was added to 0.9 ml D.W and 0.5 ml of TBA reagent. The mixture was heated for 1 h in a boiling water bath. The developed pink color was read at 532 nm. The MDA level was expressed as (nmol/mL) [19].

Statistical analysis

MedCalc for Windows, version 14.8.1 (MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium) was used for statistical analysis. Semen parameters were expressed as Mean ± SD. Parameters were tested for normality using Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Significant difference between infertile and fertile groups was calculated using Mann–Whitney independent sample test. Differences at p value ≤ 0.05 were considered as significant.

Results

Semen basic parameters of infertile and fertile men are presented in Table 1. No significant differences were observed in semen volume and sperm concentration, total count, motility, progressive motility, non-progressive motility and morphology.

Table 1 Basic semen parameters of infertile and fertile men

TAC was significantly (p < 0.0001) lower in seminal plasma of infertile men, while no significant differences in glutathione, uric acid, albumin and MDA levels were observed (Fig. 1). In the comparison of oxidative stress parameters in blood serum, serum TAC level in normozoospermic infertile men was significantly (p < 0.01) lower than of fertile men, and no significant differences in glutathione, uric acid, albumin and MDA levels were found (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1
figure1

Semen oxidative stress markers of normozoospermic infertile and fertile men in seminal plasma a TAC, b glutathione, c uric acid, d total protein and e MDA. *Significant (p < 0.001) versus fertile

Fig. 2
figure2

Serum oxidative stress markers of Idiopathic infertile and fertile men in seminal plasma a TAC, b glutathione, c uric acid, d total protein and e MDA. *Significant (p < 0.01) versus fertile

Discussion

Normal semen parameters do not guarantee fertility; many factors may be related to male infertility rather than sperm count, motility and morphology which are not included in basic semen analysis [20]. However, new biochemical parameters have been studied widely over the last decades including oxidative stress to help in identifying the underlying cause of unexplained male infertility [21, 22].

Recently, growing evidences have indicated the role of TAC in male infertility. Decreasing seminal plasma antioxidant status may have a significant role in the etiology of sperm abnormality [23]. In our study, TAC was lower in the seminal plasma of infertile men (Fig. 1); this finding agrees with previously reported results [24, 25]. The negative correlation between ROS and antioxidants has been confirmed; low seminal antioxidant potential allows ROS overproduction in infertile men [26]. The exposure to ROS is extremely destructive to sperm plasma membrane [12]. Sperm–oocyte fusion is a membrane-dependent processes; oxidation of sperm membrane impairs the penetration ability of the spermatozoa and causes infertility in normozoospermic men [27].

Along with seminal antioxidants assessment, serum TAC determination has been recently proposed as a valuable marker to evaluate the sperm quality [28]. However, serum oxidative stress marker in relation to male infertility is less investigated and poorly understood [29]. Serum levels of TAC were significantly different (p < 0.01) between infertile and fertile men (Fig. 2). This finding is in agreement with the results of Benedetti et al. [29], and with our previous report [30], both were reported a decrease in serum TAC in infertile compared to fertile men. In contrast, our results disagree with Eroglu et al. [31]; they reported no significant difference in serum TAC between normozoospermic infertile and fertile men. Glutathione showed to be influencing sperm motility by way of prevention of lipid peroxidation of sperm cell membrane [32]. However, no significant difference in semen and serum glutathione level was found between the different groups. These results agree with previous reports by Guz et al. [33] and Feng et al. [34]; they reported no significant differences in semen and serum uric acid concentration between fertile and infertile men [33, 34]. However, in a disagreement, Bhardwaj et al. [35] reported a significant decrease in semen glutathione level in infertile men, and Thiele et al. [14] reported significant decrease in uric acid concentration in normozoospermic infertile men comparing to fertile men.

Few studies have investigated the possible relationship between seminal plasma albumin and sperm quality; a weak positive correlation between albumin and sperm concentration was reported [36]. In the present study, no significant difference in albumin concentration was found. MDA has related to glutathione concentration, and both have shown to influence sperm quality [37]. MDA level has been reported to negatively correlate with sperm concentration and motility [38]; MDA levels do not significantly differ between the studied infertile and fertile groups. However, it was previously reported that MDA has negatively correlated with sperm quality and significantly higher in seminal plasma of infertile men [39, 40]. One explanation for the discrepancy of the findings of the aforementioned studies is the heterogeneity of studies in selection of patients, methodologies, methods used to assess OS as well as genetic and racial factors. Our study has some limitations which include the small number of participants and the lack of long term follow up, so further large-scale prospective studies are warranted to consolidate the evidence presented in this study.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that total antioxidant capacity (TAC) affects male fecundity. TAC level induces oxidative stress and consequently declines sperm fertilization capability even in men with normal basic sperm parameters. Estimation of TAC can be used as an investigative marker in the diagnosis of male infertility. The beneficial usage of antioxidants should be considered in the treatment of oxidative stress-induced male infertility. Further clinical trials are needed to investigate the therapeutic effect of antioxidant supplementation in the treatment of male infertility.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

OS:

Oxidative stress

TAC:

Total antioxidant capacity

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

MDA:

Malondialdehyde

TBA:

Thiobarbituric acid

BCG:

Bromocresol green

DTNB:

5,5′-Dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid)

BMI:

Body mass index

DW:

Distilled water

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. 1.

    Palani A et al (2020) Geographical differences in semen characteristics: comparing semen parameters of infertile men of the United States and Iraq. Andrologia 52:e13519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Alahmar AT (2018) The effects of oral antioxidants on the semen of men with idiopathic oligoasthenoteratozoospermia. Clin Exp Reprod Med 45:57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Selvam MKP, Sengupta P, Agarwal A (2020) Sperm DNA fragmentation and male infertility. In: Genetics of male infertility. Springer, Cham

  4. 4.

    Khalil AA, Hussien HM, Sarhan EM (2012) Oxidative stress induces idiopathic infertility in Egyptian males. Afr J Biotechnol 11:1516–1522

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Özdamar A, Soylu A, Culha M et al (2004) Testicular oxidative stress. Urol Int 73:343–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Sikka SC, Rajasekaran M, Hellstrom WJ (1995) Role of oxidative stress and antioxidants in male infertility. J Androl 16:464–468

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Hsieh Y-Y, Chang C-C, Lin C-S (2006) Seminal malondialdehyde concentration but not glutathione peroxidase activity is negatively correlated with seminal concentration and motility. Int J Biol Sci 2:23

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kefer JC, Agarwal A, Sabanegh E (2009) Role of antioxidants in the treatment of male infertility. Int J Urol 16:449–457

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Agarwal A, Saleh RA (2002) Role of oxidants in male infertility: rationale, significance, and treatment. Urol Clin North Am 29:817–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Alahmar AT (2019) Role of oxidative stress in male infertility: an updated review. J Hum Reprod Sci 12:4

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Roychoudhury S, Sharma R, Sikka S et al (2016) Diagnostic application of total antioxidant capacity in seminal plasma to assess oxidative stress in male factor infertility. J Assist Reprod Gen 33:627–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Pahune PP, Choudhari AR, Muley PA (2013) The total antioxidant power of semen and its correlation with the fertility potential of human male subjects. J Clin Diagn Res 7:991–995

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ochseedorf FR, Buhl R, Bästlein A et al (1998) Glutathione le spermatozoa and seminal plasma of infertile men. Hum Reprod 13:353–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Thiele J, Freisleben H, Fuchs J et al (1995) Ascorbic acid and urate in human seminal plasma: determination and interrelationships with chemiluminescence in washed semen. Hum Reprod 10:110–115

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Banihani SA (2018) Role of uric acid in semen. Biomolecules 2018(8):65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Alvarez JG, Storey BT (1983) Taurine, hypotaurine, epinephrine and albumin inhibit lipid peroxidation in rabbit spermatozoa and protect against loss of motility. Biol Reprod 29:548–555

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Colagar AH, Pouramir M, Marzony ET et al (2009) Relationship between seminal malondialdehyde levels and sperm quality in fertile and infertile men. Braz Arch Biol Technol 52:1387–1392

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Moron MS, Depierre JW, Mannervik B (1979) Levels of glutathione, glutathione reductase and glutathione S-transferase activities in rat lung and liver. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA)-General Subjects 582:67–78

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Rao B, Soufir J, Martin M et al (1989) Lipid peroxidation in human spermatozoa as relatd to midpiece abnormalities and motility. Gamete Res 24:127–134

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Pasqualotto F, Sharma R, Kobayashi H et al (2001) Oxidative stress in normospermic men undergoing infertility evaluation. J Androl 22:316–322

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Cayli S, Jakab A, Ovari L et al (2003) Biochemical markers of sperm function: male fertility and sperm selection for ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online 7:462–468

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Diamandis EP, Arnett WP, Foussias G et al (1999) Seminal plasma biochemical markers and their association with semen analysis findings. Urology 53:596–603

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Khosrowbeygi A, Zarghami N, Deldar Y (2012) Correlation between sperm quality parameters and seminal plasma antioxidants status. Int J Reprod Biomed 2:58–64

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Palani AF, Asdallh NS (2019) Effects of Low Seminal Plasma Antioxidant Potential on Semen Quality and Male Fertility. Passer J 1:4–8

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Subramanian V et al (2018) Seminal reactive oxygen species and total antioxidant capacity: correlations with sperm parameters and impact on male infertility. Clin Exp Reprod Med 45:88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Agarwal A, Sengupta P (2020) Oxidative stress and its association with male infertility. In: Male Infertility. Springer, Cham

  27. 27.

    Aitken RJ (2006) Sperm function tests and fertility. Int J Androl 29:69–75 (discussion 105–108)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Shamsi M, Venkatesh S, Kumar R et al (2010) Antioxidant levels in blood and seminal plasma and their impact on sperm parameters in infertile men. Indian J Biochem Biophys 47:38–43

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Benedetti S, Tagliamonte MC, Catalani S et al (2012) Differences in blood and semen oxidative status in fertile and infertile men, and their relationship with sperm quality. Reprod Biomed Online 25:300–306

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Palani AF (2018) Effect of serum antioxidant levels on sperm function in infertile male. Middle East Fertil Soc J 23(1):19–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Eroglu M et al (2014) Blood serum and seminal plasma selenium, total antioxidant capacity and coenzyme Q 10 levels in relation to semen parameters in men with idiopathic infertility. Biol Trace Elem Res 159:46–51

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Moslemi MK, Tavanbakhsh S (2011) Selenium–vitamin E supplementation in infertile men: effects on semen parameters and pregnancy rate. I Int J Gen Med 4:99

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Guz J, Gackowski D, Foksinski M et al (2013) Comparison of oxidative stress/DNA damage in semen and blood of fertile and infertile men. PLoS ONE 8:e68490

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Feng RX et al (2015) A pilot comparative study of 26 biochemical markers in seminal plasma and serum in infertile men. Biomed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/805328

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Bhardwaj A, Verma A, Majumdar S et al (2000) Status of vitamin E and reduced glutathione in semen of oligozoospermic and azoospermic patients. Asian J Androl 2:225–228

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Elzanaty S, Erenpreiss J, Becker C (2007) Seminal plasma albumin: origin and relation to the male reproductive parameters. Andrologia 39:60–65

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Walczak-Jedrzejowska R, Wolski JK, Slowikowska-Hilczer J (2013) The role of oxidative stress and antioxidants in male fertility. Cent European J Urol 66:60

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Collodel G, Moretti E, Micheli L et al (2015) Semen characteristics and malondialdehyde levels in men with different reproductive problems. Andrology 3:280–286

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Fafula RV, Onufrovych OK, Vorobets DZ et al (2017) Glutathione antioxidant protection system in ejaculated spermatozoa of infertile men with different forms of pathospermia. Бioлoгiчнi cтyдiї 11:17–24

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Dorostghoal M et al (2017) Oxidative stress status and sperm DNA fragmentation in fertile and infertile men. Andrologia 49:e12762

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the staff of Zanko medical laboratory at Kalar, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq, for helping and providing facilities in sample collection.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AP has done the research and wrote the article, and AA has improved the scientific writing of the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayad Palani.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Garmian (Permit No.: IRB-G: 37). All patients were participated after filling consent form written in their native language.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Authors declare that there are no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Palani, A., Alahmar, A. Impact of oxidative stress on semen parameters in normozoospermic infertile men: a case–control study. Afr J Urol 26, 50 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-020-00061-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Unexplained infertility
  • Normozoospermia
  • Total antioxidant capacity
  • Antioxidants