Ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: indication, morbidity and outcome at Hopital General Idrissa Pouye

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided prostate biopsy has a higher sensitivity than the ultrasound-guided biopsy, but its realization requires a dedicated interventional MRI, specific material, which is not available in our context; hence, ultrasound-guided biopsy remains of great interest. Currently, ultrasound-guided biopsy outside of a clinical trial is the gold standard for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. The objective of our work is to evaluate our practice of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy using an endorectal probe by describing the technique and evaluating the morbidity and results. This is a descriptive study of ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsies performed over a 2-year period. The parameters studied were frequency of the procedure, age, rectal examination findings, total PSA level, prostate biopsy morbidities and results. Descriptive statistics were performed, and comparison of qualitative variables was made by the Chi-square test with statistical significance set for α < 5% Two hundred and thirty-one patients were included over a two-year period. The mean age of our patients was 65 ± 8.2 years. Rectal examination finding was suspicious in 36.9% and the median total PSA was 19.8 ng/ml (0.1-5936 ng/ml). Seventy-seven percent of patients reported their pathology results. Prostatic adenocarcinoma was the most common finding accounting for 53.7% of results. Complications were observed in 16 patients (6.9%) with a predominance of initial hematuria, voiding pain and fever. In our series, the cancer detection rate was significant and the complications rate was acceptable at 6.9%.


Background
Prostate biopsy with pathology examination confirms the diagnosis of prostate cancer. The biopsy is indicated if there is an abnormality of the digital rectal examination and/or an elevation of the total PSA level. This is an invasive procedure with an overall morbidity between 3 and 23% and an exceptional but not zero mortality [1,2]. For a long time, the procedure was digitally guided transrectally. Comparatively, there is a greater sensitivity of ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer making that procedure recommended for the confirmation of prostate cancer [3,4]. Mbassi et al. [5] had found in them a higher sensitivity of the ultrasound-guided biopsy compared to the finger-guided one (61.8 and 38.3 (p = 0.006), respectively). Schoot et al. [6] in their study had shown that the magnetic resonance imaging-guided

Open Access
African Journal of Urology *Correspondence: ndiaymodou87@gmail.com 1 Service d'urologie CHU Aristide Le Dantec de Dakar, Dakar, Senegal Full list of author information is available at the end of the article prostate biopsy and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy did not significantly differ in overall prostate cancer detection (sensitivity 0.85 and 0.81, respectively). The realization for MRI-guided prostate biopsy requires a dedicated interventional MRI, specific material, which is not available in our context, hence ultrasound-guided biopsy remains of great interest. The objective of our work is to highlight our practice of prostate biopsy using an endorectal probe in order to describe the technique and evaluate the morbidity and results of the ultrasoundguided prostate biopsy.

Methods
This was a cross-sectional descriptive study of 231 patients who underwent an ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy between November 1, 2015, and October 31, 2017, in our center. All patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy during the study period were included. Patients who underwent a digitally guided prostate biopsy and a transperineal biopsy were excluded. Each patient was informed of the importance and complications of biopsy. Antibiotic prophylaxis was given by a single oral fluoroquinolone two hour before the procedure or by a third-generation cephalosporin if the patient had previously received antibiotic therapy. Rectal preparation with Sodium dihydrogenphosphate dihydrate and sodium hydrogenphosphate dodecahydrate by a cleansing enema the day before at 10 p.m and the morning of the biopsy at 6 a.m was systematic. The patient was placed in a lithotomy position under local anesthesia (10 ml of 20% xylocaine urethral gelly 10 min before the biopsy). A Logiq C2 brand ultrasound machine was used. The ultrasound transrectal probe was a 7 MHz multiplanar electronic probe.
A 20-cm-length, thin needle of 18 G Type "tru-Cut'' length and a metallic guide were used. The rest of the equipment included a core collection box containing Formalin 10%, sterile gloves, condoms and ultrasound jelly. Twelve biopsy cores were sampled at the following locations: two from the base, two from the middle and two from the prostatic apex of each prostatic lobe. In addition, sampling of palpable nodules at digital rectal examination and hypoechoic areas was also performed. In some cases where the total PSA level and locally advanced tumor, the number of cores sampled was two in each lobe. The parameters studied were frequency, age, digital rectal examination, total PSA level, histological results and morbidity. For the assessment of morbidity, patients were followed up for 2 weeks. Data analysis was done with IBM SPSS Statistic 20 software. We performed descriptive statistics with median calculations (interquartile range) for quantitative variables. The comparison of qualitative variables was made by the Chi-square test. Statistical significance was considered for α < 5%.

Results
Two hundred and thirty-one patients were included over a two-year period, with a mean annual frequency of 115.5. The mean age of the patients was 65 ± 8.2 years. The most represented age group was [60, 70 years].
The symptoms of lower urinary tract (LUTS) were the most frequent reason for referral (Table 1).
Digital rectal examination showed prostate induration in 22.9% (53) of patients, a multinodular prostate in 16.4% (38) of patients, an enlarged prostate of benign appearance in 22.1% (51) of patients and normal prostate gland in 15.2% (35) of patients. Fifty-four patients (23.4%) were referred for elevation of the total PSA level. Median total PSA was 19.8 ng/ml (Range: 0.1;5936 ng/ml). Of the 231 patients, 177 (77%) reported their pathology result. Prostatic adenocarcinoma was the most frequent diagnosis, accounting for 54% of the patients who reported their result (Fig. 1). Adenocarcinoma was more frequent in the age group [60-70 years but there was no statistically significant difference compared to the other age groups (p = 0.585) ( Table 2). Prostatic adenocarcinoma predominated in patients with induration of the prostate or multinodular prostate at digital rectal examination. In contrast, adenomyofibroma predominated in cases where the prostate was normal or benign in appearance on the digital rectal examination ( Table 2). The correlation between digital rectal examination and pathology type showed that the digital examination influenced the pathology results (p = 0.000). Among the patients with elevated PSA levels, 14 patients had prostatic adenocarcinoma. In patients with prostate adenocarcinoma, 73% had a PSA level greater than 20 ng/ml ( Table 2). Statistical analysis showed a statistically significant correlation between the level of total PSA and pathology result (p = 0.000). The Gleason score of 8 (4 + 4) was more frequent and represented 35.7% of positive biopsy (Table 3).
Postbiopsy complication was noted in 16 patients (6.9%) after a 15-day follow-up. These complications were: • Dysuria in four patients who progressed well on analgesics • Persistent Rectorrhagia of low abundance in a patient with spontaneous resolution. • Acute prostatitis in a patient who required hospitalization and then parenteral antibiotic therapy. The evolution was favorable. • Acute urinary retention in a patient who required suprapubic catheterization. • Initial hematuria in five patients who regressed after treatment with hyperdiuresis, with spontaneous resolution. No patient has had a blood transfusion.

Discussion
Prostate biopsy is an essential procedure for the diagnosis of prostate cancer, with the exception of cases of cancer discovered on pathology in endoscopic resection chips or prostatic specimen for benign prostate surgery. In our series, the rate of cancer detection in cases of an abnormal prostate on digital rectal examination was similar to that obtained by Cros et al. [7] and Barthelemy et al. [8] who found prostate cancer in 61% and 67% of their patients, respectively. In fact, digital rectal examination alone can show a suspicion of prostate cancer in more than 50% of cases, especially in locally advanced cases, but in the other end, 23 to 45% of cancers would be ignored if the indications for biopsies were based solely on the digital rectal examination because some tumors do not cause palpable changes [9]. The determination of total PSA remains the biological reference test for prostate cancer screening in our setting. Biopsy prompted by a total PSA greater than 4 ng/ml yields a detection of cancer of nearly 50% with a positive predictive value of 32% [10]. By coupling the digital rectal examination and the total PSA, the cancer detection is almost 60% with a positive predictive value of 48% [10]. Total PSA is superior to digital rectal examination in terms of sensitivity (72.1% vs 53.2%), specificity (93.2% vs 83.6%) and positive predictive value (25.1% vs 17.8%), but the use of total PSA alone is less effective than the combination of the   two [10]. These data were confirmed by our series that showed that an anomaly of the prostate on rectal examination and/or an increase in the level of total PSA had a significant influence on the prostate biopsy result. The combination of a high total PSA and abnormal DRE gives more precision on the indication of the biopsy. Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy has the advantages of providing information on the size and shape of the prostate and showing suspicious lesions in the prostate and seminal vesicles. It also allows a precise targeting of the biopsy. An endorectal probe with a frequency of 5 to 10 MHz must be used. Several studies have compared the effectiveness of transrectal biopsy and transperineal biopsy. But no study has shown any superiority of one technique over the other. While Shinghal et al. [11] found that transperineal ultrasound-guided biopsy is less accurate than the transrectal biopsy, Terris et al. [12] in their study concluded that the transperineal approach provided a visualization of the prostate and a calculation of its volume equivalent to that of the transrectal approach, but the hypoechoic suspicious areas were not detected by the transperineal route. Transperineal ultrasound-guided biopsy is an alternative to the transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy and offered if the rectum cannot be accessed naturally. With the 12-core sampling scheme used in our series, the detection rate was 54%.
The option of carrying out an initial biopsy scheme of more than 12 samples does not significantly increase the detection rate. However, Eskew et al. [13] showed that their protocol based on biopsy in five zones with 13-18 cores sampled increases the detection rate up to 35% compared to the standard protocol. Much research has been made to improve the performance of biopsy including the sampling of other areas. Terris et al. [12] found that the side biopsy was accompanied by high efficiency in patients with a palpable nodule or hypoechoic lesions of the lateral portion of the prostate and in patients who already had negative random biopsies. The accuracy of ultrasound-guided biopsy with a sensitivity and positive predictive value greater than the digitally guided biopsy could explain the rate of positive biopsy. From a review compiling 639 cases of negative digitally guided biopsies with subsequent ultrasound-guided biopsy, Fortunoff et al. [14] identified 12.8% of cancer cases, while Hodge et al. [15] and Rifkin et al. [16] noted 53.5% and 39.3% of false negatives, respectively. The complications of transrectal prostate biopsy are generally of limited gravity, if antibiotic prophylaxis is administered. In the literature, in the absence of antibiotic prophylaxis, there are between 4 and 25% of post-biopsy urinary tract infections and 0 to 7% of severe infections. With antibiotic prophylaxis, the proportion of all infectious complications decreases to 0-9% [17]. Gram-negative bacilli (E. coli) are the most frequent causes of post-biopsy urinary tract infections [17,18]. Resistance to fluoroquinolones is associated with 40% of complications in the series by Duboureau H et al. [18]. The complication rate varies in the literature from 3 to 23% of cases [14,15,19]. Infectious and hemorrhagic complications are the main complications of prostate biopsy, which has been confirmed by our series. A 6.9% complication rate was found in our series. this rate is low compared to those found in the literature [16,20]. This difference in the infection rates could be explained by the rectal preparation and the antibiotic prophylaxis which were systematic in our patients.

Conclusion
Ultrasound-guided transrectal prostate biopsy is an appropriate indication for the diagnosis of prostate cancer in terms of pathologic accuracy and relatively lower morbidity. In our series, the cancer detection rate was significant and the complications rate was acceptable at 6.9%.