- Case Reports
- Open access
- Published:
Spermatic cord liposarcoma presented as scrotal swelling: a case report
African Journal of Urology volume 30, Article number: 43 (2024)
Abstract
Background
Liposarcoma is considered the most common among spermatic cord sarcomas. It usually presents as a progressively enlarging inguinoscrotal mass. The resemblance between the spermatic cord liposarcoma and the inguinal hernia allows the swelling to be tolerated for a long duration giving time for hematogenous dissemination. In this article, we share the experience of a unique case of metastatic liposarcoma of the spermatic cord that showed a stationary course of the lower abdominal satellite lesions on follow-up following palliative resection.
Case presentation
We present a case of a 53-year-old male with progressively enlarging painless scrotal swelling over 1-year duration. A heterogeneous lesion of the right hemiscrotum and spermatic cord with non-specific radiological features was described by imaging. Two lower abdominal skip lesions were also discovered synchronously in addition to the primary one and were designated inoperable as they were adherent to the nearby bowel loops. The patient underwent cytoreductive surgery of the primary tumour which was proven to be an undifferentiated liposarcoma with free safety margins based on histopathology. Finally, the patient was referred for adjuvant chemotherapy and sequential follow-up.
Conclusions
Despite being a rare tumour, the radiologist should always consider the liposarcoma of the spermatic cord in the differential diagnosis of inguinoscrotal lesions even in the absence of typical imaging features. The diagnosis and management of spermatic cord liposarcoma remain a challenge with no clear accepted guidelines.
1 Background
The inguinal canal in males contains the vas deferens, testicular artery and vein, lymphatic vessels, and nerves which compose the spermatic cord (SC) [1]. Although the pathologic conditions affecting the SC are relatively common in clinical practice [2, 3], malignant lesions of the SC on the other hand are extremely rare [4], with the liposarcoma of the spermatic cord (LSC) being the most prevalent accounting for 3–7% of SC neoplasms [5,6,7,8,9] and usually presents between the 5th and 6th decades of life [10]. The typical presentation of LSC is a progressively enlarging painless scrotal mass [11]. As this presentation is shared by a wide variety of lesions, it is challenging to make a diagnosis based on clinical examination alone [1, 8].
As the SC is the seat of a wide variety of lesions from different entities, the radiologist must become familiar with the characteristic imaging findings in each type [2, 3]. The distinguishing imaging features of each pathology affecting the SC are summarized in Fig. 1. Being readily available, cheap and devoid of radiation hazards, ultrasound (US) is considered the primary imaging modality for inguinoscrotal swellings. Although it provides valuable information, it offers no definite discrimination between benign and malignant lesions [7, 12]. Contrast-enhanced computerized tomography (CECT) is usually suggestive of the diagnosis and helps determine the involvement of the anterior abdominal wall or the retroperitoneum [9]. By CECT, LSC usually appears as a heterogeneously enhancing inguinal soft tissue mass with variable areas of fat attenuation [5, 6]. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows accurate delineation of the tumour margins and tissue characterization [13]. The appearance of LSC by MRI is variable depending on the degree of differentiation [14].
Radical orchiectomy with wide local tissue resection is the accepted surgical treatment for LSC [1, 8]. The role of radiotherapy in the management is unclear and is believed to decrease the rate of local recurrence [5, 6, 15]. Although the role of chemotherapy is debatable, ordinary imaging methods may not be enough to detect the response to chemotherapy. A significant vascular response has been reported in a remarkable percentage of the patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy [16]. As the LSC is usually metastatic at the time of discovery, palliative resection by wide local excision of the primary tumour may be performed. This procedure should be performed on patients who are not candidates for complete radical resection to improve symptoms, prevent complications, and improve survival [17, 18].
In this article, we present a challenging case of painless scrotal swelling with suspicious radiological criteria that was proven later to be a liposarcoma. Being a rare tumour [1], we aimed to offer this step-wise approach in the diagnosis and post-treatment follow-up of a case of LSC, which might prove useful in future studies concerned with this entity of neoplasms.
2 Case presentation
We present a case of a 53-year-old male who presented to the urology and nephrology center with a large painless right hemiscrotal swelling that showed a progressively enlarging size for 1 year. Scrotal US revealed a large heterogenous soft tissue mass with both hyperechoic and hypoechoic components (Fig. 2). By colour Doppler (CD), the mass showed no significant internal vascularity (Fig. 2). Based on the sonographic findings, the provisional diagnosis was suspicious right hemiscrotal mass. The patient underwent CECT which revealed a large right hemiscrotal lesion extending into the SC showing foci of calcifications with mild post-contrast enhancement (Fig. 3). Another two satellite lesions were synchronously identified in the lower abdomen (Fig. 3). By MRI, the signal intensity of the lesion was low in T1 and high in T2 with no signal drop in fat-suppression sequence (Fig. 4). This signal was atypical for a fat-containing lesion. Based on the radiological findings, the two lower abdominal masses were inoperable as they were adherent to the bowel loops (Fig. 3) and found to be exerting traction on the adjacent mesentery and narrowing of the distal part of the descending and sigmoid colon. There was a subsequent dilatation of the transverse and the proximal descending colon (Fig. 5). The decision was to do a palliative right high inguinal orchiectomy to decrease the tumour burden and refer the patient for postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.
2.1 Operative details
An inguinal incision was done with an extension to the neck of the scrotum. The scrotum was opened in layers and the cord was identified. The mass was identified and dissected. The cord was ligated. Right orchiectomy was successfully performed and the scrotum was closed in layers.
2.2 Histopathology findings
On gross examination, the operative specimen was the right SC, the testis, and the mass collectively weighing about 1020 g. The SC was 7 cm in length with a mass attached to it measuring about 11 × 5 × 5 cm and 2 cm away from the safety margin. The testis was normal in size with the mass attached to it which measured about 13 × 9 × 11 cm and 7 cm away from the safety margin. The microscopic examination of the slides prepared from the SC revealed atypical spindle-shaped cells and giant lipoblasts with hyperchromatic nuclei embedded in a dense fibrous stroma (Fig. 6). Slides prepared from the paratesticular mass were also examined revealing fascicles of pleomorphic spindle cells with a focus of peculiar whirling. Immunohistochemical stains for vimentin and S-100 were positive in the SC and negative in the undifferentiated areas in the paratesticular mass. Both were negative for desmin, pan-cytokeratin (Fig. 6) and CD34. The final diagnosis was SC and paratesticular undifferentiated liposarcoma with a free safety margin.
2.3 Outcome
As the adjuvant chemotherapy protocol was highly dependent on the histological type of the residual lesion, the patient underwent an US-guided biopsy from the residual lower abdominal masses. Examination of the slides prepared from the obtained biopsy cores revealed similar pathology. The patient was referred to the medical oncology department for adjuvant chemotherapy and received 6 cycles of doxorubicin-based protocol (doxorubicin and ifosfamide). Sequential follow-up by post-contrast CT after 2 and 6 months revealed a clear right hemiscrotum and a stationary course regarding both the lower abdominal masses and the dilated large bowel loops (Fig. 7).
2.4 Imaging methods
The Doppler ultrasonography examination was performed using both a linear array transducer (7.5 MHZ) and a curvilinear probe (3.5 MHZ) for examination of the scrotum and the SC with a GE-LOGIQ E9 US scanner by a specialist radiologist who had 5Â years of experience in uroradiology. The CECT examination of the abdomen and pelvis was performed using a multidetector CT scan (GE-healthcare). The MRI examination of the pelvis and scrotum was performed by a 1.5 Tesla scanner (Philips Ingenia). CT and MRI findings were interpreted by a consultant with 7Â years of experience in uroradiology. US-guided biopsy from the lower abdominal masses was performed by a specialist in interventional radiology with 5Â years of experience using the US machine mentioned previously and an 18G tru-cut biopsy needle.
3 Discussion
Although liposarcoma is the most prevalent kind of sarcoma in adults [1, 8], LSC is rare [4]. Sambel M. and his colleagues mentioned about 200 LSC cases to have been reported in English written literature [19]. Morozumi et al. mentioned that only 326 cases of LSC have been reported with only 15% of them being of the undifferentiated entity [1].
Most of the literature suggests the age of presentation of LSC to be between the 5th and 6th decades of life [20]. Our patient was 53 years old. This agrees with the age range mentioned by Ogbue OD [6] and the case report of Shaban Y, et al., in which the age of the patient in the latter was 59 years [1]. The patient’s age in our case report, to some extent, matches that mentioned by Mokrani A., et al. (64 years) [8]. However, Pergel A, et al. mentioned a different age for the patient presented in his case (81 years) [4].
The chief complaint of LSC patients is usually a palpable scrotal or inguinal mass [20]. The presenting symptom in our case was a progressively enlarging inguinal swelling matching the complaint presented by Hamed WMA, et al., Ogbue OD and Shaban Y, et al., who all mentioned similar presentation [1, 6, 7]. Our patient was symptomatic for one year agreeing with Pergel A, et al. who mentioned similar duration with rapid growth in the last 3 months before the time of discovery [4]. On the other hand, Jeremić D, et al. mentioned a shorter period of symptoms (6 months) [12].
Our US description of the lesion matched that of Shimamori N, et al. who described the LSC as a heterogeneous paratesticular mass with mixed echogenicity [21]. Although this description was not specific to LSC, the heterogeneity and indistinct borders were strongly suggestive of a malignant nature regardless of its type by histopathology [21]. Although Jeremić D, et al. described the LSC as a hypervascular mass [12], the lesion in our case showed no significant vascularity by CD. The undifferentiated nature of our lesion might explain this. We concluded that heterogenous paratesticular masses should be considered suspicious regardless of the vascularity of the lesion.
The CECT findings in our case were a large enhancing right hemiscrotal mass with foci of calcifications (Fig. 1). This agrees with the description and enhancement pattern offered by Lu J, et al., who mentioned that the majority of the masses showed islands of flake-like enhancement, reflecting the hypervascular areas within the lesion [22]. In our case, the satellite lesions were discovered by CT synchronously with the original lesion (Fig. 2). This also agrees with Lu J, et al. who mentioned that the presence of satellite lesions was common among the undifferentiated liposarcoma [22]. We concluded that the field of view in the CT examination of a suspicious inguinoscrotal swelling should include the abdomen to reveal remote lesions.
Our lesion showed a low signal in T1 images and a high signal in T2 images by MRI with no significant signal drop in the fat-suppression sequence reflecting the undifferentiated nature (Fig. 4). These findings agree with the case report of An J. and Kim KW [23]. Henceforth, even in the absence of fat suppression, LSC should be included in the differential diagnosis of the SC lesions. Since the MRI findings in our case were atypical for fat-containing lesions, we concluded that the main role of pre-operative imaging is the accurate delineation of the tumour margins and extension beyond the scrotum rather than the characterization of the nature of the lesion which An J. and Kim KW also concluded [23].
Based on the WHO classification, LSC is categorized into five types well-differentiated, undifferentiated, myxoid, round cell, and pleomorphic [5]. It has been suggested that LSC may arise de novo from SC tissues or on top of malignant transformation of a preexisting lipoma [8]. Although most cases reported in the literature were well-differentiated [12], the histologic subtype of the lesion in our case was found to be undifferentiated. This agrees with the case report offered by Shaban Y, et al. and Mokrani A, et al. who mentioned the presence of a dedifferentiated component [1, 8].
Although surgeons’ experience with LSC has been described in many instances, there are no clear management guidelines [1, 8]. Our patient underwent palliative resection with a high inguinal orchiectomy despite the presence of two inoperable satellite lesions at the time of discovery which showed a stationary course on follow-up (Fig. 7). The patients in the cases presented by Shaban Y, et al., Chalouhy C, et al. and Sahnoun W, et al. underwent radical orchiectomy with en bloc resection of the mass [1, 5, 9]. In the case report of Hamed WMA, et al., the lesion was excised with preservation of the spermatic cord and the testicle [7]. Shaban Y, et al., and Chalouhy C, et al. mentioned no recurrence after surgery with no satellite lesions [1, 9]. Hamed WMA, et al. didn’t mention the follow-up results of their case [7]. Sahnoun W, et al. mentioned local recurrence after about four years in a patient who had a dedifferentiated component by histopathology [5]. The patient presented by Mokrani A, et al., also underwent orchiectomy, however, the patient was lost to follow-up and subsequently experienced recurrence after two years [8].
The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in LSC remains controversial. The use of adjuvant doxorubicin-based chemotherapy for resected soft tissue sarcomas was evaluated in a meta-analysis and showed an increase in the overall survival [8]. The patient in our case received a doxorubicin-based protocol of chemotherapy. This agrees with Livingston JA, et al. who mentioned that the majority of the patients with liposarcoma received the doxorubicin–ifosfamide protocol [16]. The patient in the case report mentioned by Mokrani A, et al. was also referred for adjuvant chemotherapy [8]. However, in our case, the patient was referred for adjuvant chemotherapy following the primary operation. In the later-mentioned study, the patient was referred for adjuvant chemotherapy following the 2nd operation after recurrence [8].
Finally, LSC is usually mentioned as sporadic cases or as part of larger studies of liposarcoma with no dedicated studies concerned with this specific and rare entity of neoplasms [23]. The diagnosis of LSC is challenging since the presentation is shared by a wide variety of lesions [7, 9, 23]. There is no specific treatment plan and most of the experience is based on trials mentioned in the case reports [1, 8]. Henceforth, we could not compare the adequateness of the patient’s response to therapy on follow-up, with those of the other case reports as the course of the disease differed from ours and the follow-up interval was different. Moreover, the lesion in our case showed atypical radiological criteria for a fat-containing lesion owing to its undifferentiated nature. All these factors contributed to the difficulty in our approach to the case.
4 Conclusions
Heterogenous paratesticular masses should be designated suspicious till proven otherwise. Undifferentiated histological types of LSC may show atypical imaging features. The imaging of SC masses should include the abdomen to detect skip lesions. The main role of pre-operative radiology is the accurate delineation of tumour margins. The management of LSC remains controversial with no accepted evidence-based protocol for management.
5 Limitations
The images of the gross specimen were not available, as this article was written retrospectively after reviewing the postoperative radiology. The excised paratesticular and spermatic cord masses were not photographed.
Availability of data and materials
The data used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- LSC:
-
Liposarcoma of the spermatic cord
- SC:
-
Spermatic cord
- CECT:
-
Contrast-enhanced computerized tomography
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- US:
-
Ultrasound
- CD:
-
Colour Doppler
- MHZ:
-
Megahertz
- G:
-
Gauge
References
Shaban Y, Elkbuli A, Kim D, Abdulla A, Boneva D, McKenney M, Wolf J (2020) Dedifferentiated liposarcoma of the spermatic cord: case report and review of literature. Int J Surg Case Rep 1(72):418–422
Karbasian N, Segaran N, Solomon N, Pellerito JS, Katz DS, Moshiri M, Revzin MV (2022) Pathologic conditions at imaging of the spermatic cord. Radiographics 42(3):741–758
Dagur G, Gandhi J, Kapadia K, Inam R, Smith NL, Joshi G, Khan SA (2017) Neoplastic diseases of the spermatic cord: an overview of pathological features, evaluation, and management. Transl Androl Urol 6(1):101
Pergel A, Yucel AF, Aydin I, Sahin DA, Gucer H, Kocakusak A (2011) Paratesticular liposarcoma: a radiologic pathologic correlation. J Clin Imaging Sci. https://doi.org/10.4103/2156-7514.90952
Sahnoun W, Chakroun M, Zaghbib S, Saadi A, Blel A, Rammeh S, Ayed H, Chebil M (2022) 2022 Management and prognosis of liposarcomas of the spermatic cord: an experience with six cases. J Surg Case Rep 1:rjab621
Ogbue OD, Haddad A, Daw H (2021) Spermatic cord liposarcoma: a case report and review of the literature on the role of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in preventing locoregional recurrence. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.19567
Hamed WMA, Khalaf HM, Allam WM, Abo Rokba KT, Abdelmoneim Sharara EAA, AbdelAty MEA (2023) Liposarcoma of spermatic cord: a case report. Egypt J Hosp Med 90(1):1300–1302
Mokrani A, Guermazi F, Meddeb K, Kacem LB, Chakroun M, Yahyaoui Y, Letaief F, Gabsi A, Bouzouita A, Ayadi M, Chraiet N (2018) Liposarcoma of the spermatic cord: A case report and review of literature. Urol Case Rep 1(21):19–20
Chalouhy C, Ruck JM, Moukarzel M, Jourdi R, Dagher N, Philosophe B (2017) Current management of liposarcoma of the spermatic cord: a case report and review of the literature. Mol Clin Oncol 6(3):438–440
Di Gregorio M, D’Hondt L, Lorge F, Nollevaux MC (2017) Liposarcoma of the spermatic cord: an infrequent pathology. Case Rep Oncol 10(1):136–142
Ebey BN, Naouar S, Faidi B, Lahouar R, Khalifa BB, El Kamel R (2021) Pleomorphic spermatic cord liposarcoma: a case report and review of management. Int J Surg Case Rep 1(81):105725
Jeremić D, Maletin M, Vojinov S, Levakov I, Grbić D, Lakić T, Trivunić DS (2021) Liposarcoma of the spermatic cord–diagnostic and therapeutic issue. Acta Clin Croat 60(1):50–53
Yamamichi G, Nakata W, Yamamoto A, Tsujimura G, Tsujimoto Y, Nin M, Tsujihata M (2018) Liposarcoma of the spermatic cord associated with scrotum lipoma: a case report and review of the literature. Urol Case Rep 1(17):114–116
Yoshida K, Nakamura T, Nakamura K, Matsuyama Y, Hagi T, Asanuma K, Sudo A (2023) The Characteristics of magnetic resonance imaging and immunohistochemical findings in de-differentiated liposarcoma. J Orthop Surg 31(1):10225536231151520
Cerda T, Martin É, Truc G, Créhange G, Maingon P (2017) Safety and efficacy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the management of spermatic cord sarcoma. Cancer/Radiothérapie 21(1):16–20
Livingston JA, Bugano D, Barbo A, Lin H, Madewell JE, Wang WL, Lazar AJ, Tseng WW, Roland CL, Feig BW, Pollock R (2017) Role of chemotherapy in dedifferentiated liposarcoma of the retroperitoneum: defining the benefit and challenges of the standard. Sci Rep 7(1):11836
Lu W, Lau J, Xu MD, Zhang Y, Jiang Y, Tong HX, Zhu J, Lu WQ, Qin XY (2013) Recurrent abdominal liposarcoma: analysis of 19 cases and prognostic factors. World J Gastroenterol: WJG 19(25):4045
Shibata D, Lewis JJ, Leung DH, Brennan MF (2001) Is there a role for incomplete resection in the management of retroperitoneal liposarcomas? J Am Coll Surg 193(4):373–379
Sambel M, Demirbas M, Yalcin O, Erdogan A, Oner S, Kilic M, Aydos M (2015) Liposarcoma of the spermatic cord: a case report. Can Urol Assoc J 9(7–8):E527
Coleman J, Brennan MF, Alektiar K, Russo P (2003) Adult spermatic cord sarcomas: management and results. Ann Surg Oncol 10:669–675
Shimamori N, Kishino T, Morii T, Okabe N, Motohashi M, Matsushima S, Yamasaki S, Ohtsuka K, Shibahara J, Ichimura S, Ohnishi H (2019) Sonographic appearances of liposarcoma: correlations with pathologic subtypes. Ultrasound Med Biol 45(9):2568–2574
Lu J, Qin Q, Zhan LL, Yang X, Xu Q, Yu J, Dou LN, Zhang H, Yang Y, Chen XC, Yang YH (2014) Computed tomography manifestations of histologic subtypes of retroperitoneal liposarcoma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 15(15):6041–6046
An J, Kim KW (2022) Paratesticular liposarcoma with atypical image findings: a case report. Investig Magn Reson Imaging 26(1):66–70
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
The authors declare that they have no funding sources.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors have read and approved the manuscript for publishing. MS: analysed the patient’s data, wrote the main body of the manuscript, and revised different sections of the document before publishing.IE: provided the patient’s data and revised the article before submission. AA: shared in writing the discussion section.AM: shared in the preparation of the figures.SE: revised the case report, provided literature sources, and contributed to the evaluation of radiological findings.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
An informed consent was obtained from the patient.
Consent for publication
An informed consent was obtained from the patient to use the necessary data for publication.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ayyad, M.S., Elgaml, I., Mohammad, A.A. et al. Spermatic cord liposarcoma presented as scrotal swelling: a case report. Afr J Urol 30, 43 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-024-00446-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-024-00446-x