Skip to main content

Table 4 Differences between laparoscopic and open surgery group regarding post operative data

From: Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy: prospective randomized study for assessment of surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes

 

Total

(N. = 135)

N. %

Lap (N. = 60)

N. %

Open (N. = 75)

N. %

Chi-square test

P value

Post operative GFR

Mean ± SD = 70.7 ± 17.5

Mean ± SD = 68.7 ± 20.5

Mean ± SD = 72.3 ± 14.7

Student t test = 1.197

< .001

(HS)

PADUA score

Median (IQR) = 7 (6–9)

Median = 8

IQR = 6–9

Median = 7

IQR = 6–8

2.118*

.034

(S)

Pain score

Median (IQR) = 8 (6–9)

Median = 7

IQR = 6–8

Median = 8

IQR = 7–9

4.161*

< .001

(HS)

6 h pain score

Median (IQR) = (1–2)

Median = 1

IQR = 1–2

Median = 2

IQR = 2–3

7.546*

< .001

(HS)

Stenting post operative

Yes

17

12.6%

4

6.7%

5

6.7%

.000

1.0

 

No

118

87.4%

56

93.3%

70

93.3%

  

Blood transfusion

100 ml

8

5.9%

0

0.0%

8

10.7%

7.165

.028

(S)

500 ml

15

11.1%

6

10.0%

9

12.0%

No

112

83%

54

90.0%

58

77.3%

Positive surgical margin

No

127

94.1%

54

90.0%

73

97.3%

3.891

.143

Yes- surveillance every6 months for 2 years

2

1.5%

2

3.3%

0

0.0%

Yes- surveillance radical nephrectomy 10 months

6

4.4%

4

6.7%

2

2.7%

  1. Bold values indicate the accepted level of significance (S) was (p < 0.05), p ≤ 0.001 was considered highly statistically Significant (HS), and p > 0.05 was considered Non statistically Significant (NS)
  2. LPN laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, OPN open partial nephrectomy, HS highly significant, GFR glomerular filtration rate
  3. *Mann–Whitney test was used