Skip to main content
African Journal of Urology

Table 3 Sample characteristics

From: Risk factors of stress urinary incontinence in pelvic organ prolapse patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

No

References

Sample characteristics

Outcome Data

Effect Measure

Age (years)

Parity (n)

Hysterectomy (yes)

Menopause (yes)

Obesity (BMI kg/m2)

Risk Factors Studied

OR (95% CI)

p-value

1

Khayyami et al. [16]

62.5 (± 11.4)

2 (range 0–8)

–

–

24.8 (17.5–47.0)

BMI

1.07 (1.03–1.11)

0.001

2

Wang et al. [17]

64.3 ± 11.0

2.4 ± 1.2

46 (61.3%)

59 (78.7%)

24.7 ± 3.6

LUTO

2.3 (1.2–4.6)

0.013

3

Leruth et al. [18]

63.6 ± 8.3 (range 49–79)

2.7 ± 1.7 (range 0–9)

9 (16.4%)

–

25.4 ± 3.3 (range 20.0–32.1)

Preoperative SUI

RR 4.032 (1.159–14.085)

0.028

4

Le Claire et al. [19]

62 (± 7.4)

2.5

ASCP: 11 (33.3%); MISCP: 16 (36.4%)

–

ASCP: 27.42 (± 4.19); MISCP: 27.15 (± 4.48)

Greater reduction in point Aa

4.67 (1.14, 19.22)

0.012

Abdominal surgical route

4.37 (1.42, 13.48)

0.005

5

Reena et al. [20]

51.24 years (range, 27– 75)

3.3 (range, 1–9)

–

47 (60.3%)

–

Age ≥ 50

2.07 (0.41–10.41)

 < 0.005

Postmenopausal

2.60 (0.54– 12.50)

 < 0.003

6

Cruz et al. [21]

61.2 (± 7.0)

–

27 (18.5%)

–

27.4 (± 3.8)

High BMI

RR 1.19 (1.05–1.36)

 < 0.01

Diabetes

RR 4.18 (1.32–13.21)

0.01

POP-Q Stage ≥ 3

RR 14.74 (1.64–132.0)

0.01

7

Kawaguchi et al. [22]

68 (range 43–89)

2 (range 0–9)

150 (15.6%)

939 (97.7%)

23.5 (range 16.4–35.1)

History of hysterectomy

1.802 (1.010–3.217)

0.046

cQmax (> 1.5)

2.147 (1.325–3.480)

0.002

Preoperative UUI

1.525 (1.027–2.269)

0.036

8

Syan et al. [23]

59

–

–

–

n = 940 (2.3%)

Age

1.01 (1.00–1.02)

 < 0.01

Obesity

1.98 (1.51–2.57)

 < 0.01

DM

1.19 (1.01–1.41)

0.03

combined anterior and apical repair

1.3 (1.14–1.48)

 < 0.01

use of mesh for POP repair

2.04 (1.79–2.32)

 < 0.01

9

Sato et al. [24]

71 (range 66–75)

2 (range 2–3)

–

–

23.6 (range 22.0–25.1)

Preoperative SUI

3.95 (1.14–13.7)

0.03

increased Ba measurements

1.44 (1.00–2.06)

0.04

10

Bideau et al. [25]

69 ± 7.4 years

2 ± 1.45

32 (10%)

286 (93%)

25 ± 4

Preoperative SUI

2.68 (1.35–5.31)

0.005

11

Song et al. [26]

59.5 ± 12.3 years

2 (range 0–9)

29 (14.1%)

158 (76.7%)

24.3 ± 2.9

Concomitant hysterectomy

2.86 (1.02–7.99)

0.044

OSUI

4.19 (1.99–8.86)

0.000

12

Lensen et al. [27]

62 (range 29–100)

2 (range 0–7)

–

718 (79%)

26 (range 16–42)

High BMI

1.045 (1.003–1.088)

 < 0.05

COPD

3.519 (1.573–7.869)

 < 0.05

Preoperative SUI

6.455 (4.650–8.960

 < 0.05

13

Lo et al. [28]

28–46 (7%); 47–65 (29.6%); > 66 (63.4%)

0–2 (15.5%); 3–5 (76%); > 6 (8.5%)

50 (70.42%)

64 (90.1%)

17–23 (23.9%); 23.1–29 (64.8%); > 29.1 (11.3%)

Age ≧66

2.86 (1.01–2.53)

0.014

DM

2.18 (1.63–4.21)

0.002

MUCP < 60 mmH2O

4.65 (2.87–8.64)

 < 0.001

FUL < 2 cm

3.48 (2.13–5.83)

 < 0.001

TVM type Prolift T

3.5 (1.88–5.91)

 < 0.001

TVM type Elevate A

3.48 (1.90–6.10)

 < 0.001

14

Ugianskiene et al. [29]

57 (range 28–68)

3 (range 1–5)

7 (21.2%)

–

27.1 (range 21.9–37)

Parity

–

0.03

15

Frigerio et al. [30]

63.4 ± 11.2

2.0 ± 1.0

87 (100%)

80 (92%)

24.8 ± 3.4

Preoperative SUI

3.11

0.001

Pdet at maximum flow < 30 cm H2O

2.93

0.019

16

Hu et al. [31]

69.3 (± 7.0)

2

–

50 (98%)

28.1 (± 2.8)

Unilateral levator avulsion

RR 2.23 (1.35–3.68)

 < 0.05

Bilateral levator avulsion

RR 3.12 (1.46–6.67)

 < 0.05

Age

–

 < 0.05

Obese

–

 < 0.05

Back to article page