Source | Participants No. | Non-surgical treatment | Surgical treatment | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Type of treatment | Indication | Outcome | Follow-up duration | Type of treatment | Indication | Outcome | Follow-up duration | ||
Zhang et al. (2020/China) [7] | n = 8 | Conservative treatment = 7 (no details) | First line = 7 | Successful = 7 | NR | Surgical resection = 1 | First line = 1 | Successful = 1 | NR |
Novoa-Carballal et al. (2018/Spain) [20] | n = 1 | Conservative treatment = 1 (no details) | First line = 1 | Successful with mild prolapse = 1 | NR | None | None | None | None |
McCaskill et al. (2018/USA) [4] | n = 1 | TEC = 1 | First line = 1 | Successful = 1 | 1 m | None | None | None | None |
Wei et al. (2017/China) [3] | n = 89 | Sitz baths + local ATB + steroids antispasmodic + urinary tract decontamination + manipulative reduction = 89 | First line = 89 | Successful = 14 unsuccessful = 75 (treated surgically) | 1–16 y | Surgical excision = 20 Ligation over Foley catheter = 55 | Failure of conservative treatment = 75 | Successful = 75 | 1–16 y |
Liu et al. (2017/China) [6] | n = 7 | antiinflammation therapy + perineum nursing + sitz bath + Cath = 2 | First line = 2 | Successful = 2 | 6 y | Catheter + Loop excision + Suturing with Vicryl 6/0 sutures + Local gauze packing = 5 | First line = 5 | Successful = 5 | 2 w—5 y |
Lora et al. (2017/Italy) [14] | n = 1 | TEC + oral polyethylene glycol for constipation = 1 | First line = 1 | Unsuccessful = 1 (referred to urologist) | 10 m | None | None | None | None |
Kondamudi et al. (2014/USA) [19] | n = 1 | TEC = 1 | First line = 1 | NR | NR | None | None | None | None |
Ballouhey et al. (2014/France) [1] | n = 28 | sitz baths + anti-inflammatories = 14 | First line = 14 | Successful = 9 Unsuccessful = 5 (treated surgically) | 1–52 m | Catheter + 6 holding sutures + 4 stay & temporary holding sutures in each quadrant + resection with cautery + intervening tissue sutured with two stitches. = 19 | First line = 14 Failure of conservative treatment = 5 | Successful = 19 | 1–52 m |
Ballouhey et al. (2013/France) [15] | n = 1 | sitz bath + local steroids for 3 days = 1 | First line = 1 | Unsuccessful = 1 (treated surgically) | 6 m | Resection by electrocoagulation around a Foley-type probe + suture with separate points = 1 | Failure of conservative treatment = 1 | Successful = 1 | 6 m |
Holbrook et al. (2011/UK) [8] | n = 21 | Sitz bath = 13 | First line = 13 | Successful = 13 | NR | Reduction under a general anaesthetic = 8 | First line = 8 | Successful = 3 Recurrence = 1 Partial reduction = 2 Minimal residual prolapse = 2 | NR |
Aprile et al. (2011/Italy) [2] | n = 1 | Rest = 1 | First line = 1 | Successful = 1 (recurred after 2 y) | 2 y | Surgical excision | Recurrence = 1 | NR | NR |
Fiogbe et al. (2011/Benin) [12] | n = 9 | Povidone iodine + Prophylactic ATB + anti-inflammatories = 3 | First line = 3 | Successful = 3 | 10 d | Foley’s urethra catheter + circumferential resection + muco-mucous suture = 6 | First line = 6 | Recurrence = 1 (treated again) Successful = 5 | 20 m |
Vunda et al. (2011/Switzerland) [16] | n = 1 | TEC (promestriene) + sitz baths + camomile = 1 | First line = 1 | Successful = 1 | 6 w + 20 m | None | None | None | None |
Pereira et al. (2011/UK) [17] | n = 1 | TEC, Sitz bath = 1 | First line = 1 | Unsuccessful = 1 (referred to urologists) | 4 w | None | None | None | None |
Ekenze wt al. (2009/Nigeria) [10] | n = 3 | TEC = 3 | First line = 3 | Unsuccessful = 3 (treated surgically) | 6–17 m | Excision + seromucosal stitching = 3 | Failure of medical treatment = 3 | Successful = 3 | NR |
Hillyer et al. (2009/USA) [5] | n = 34 | TEC, Sitz bath = 6 | First line = 6 | Loss of follow-up = 4 unsuccessful = 2 (treated surgically) | NR | Foley’s urethra catheter + circumferential resection + catgut sutures = 30 | Failure of medical treatment = 2 First line = 28 | Successful = 30 | 1 m |
Agarwal et al. (2008/UK) [9] | n = 2 | Manual reduction + Cath = 1 | First line = 1 | NR | NR | Four-quadrant excision = 1 (another case) | First line = 1 | NR | NR |
Shurtleff et al. (2002/USA) [13] | n = 3 | Sitz bath = 3 | First line = 3 | Unsuccessful = 3 (treated surgically) | 7 d | Four-quadrant excision = 3 | Failure of medical treatment = 3 | Successful = 3 | 2 w 8 m—2 y |
Silva-Anoma et al. (2001/Ivory Cost) [11] | n = 65 | Amoxicilline, Metronidazol + Morniflumate + Polyvidone iode = 12 | First line = 12 | Successful = 3 NR = 9 | 1 y | Doria technique = 38 Cath + excision + sutures = 15 | First line = 53 | Successful = 53 | 1 y |
McKenna et al. (1999/Queensland) (18) | n = 1 | TEC and steroid cream = 1 | First line = 1 | Unsuccessful = 1 (treated surgically) | 4 m | Foley’s urethra catheter + circumferential resection + epithelium suture = 1 | Failure of medical treatment = 1 | Successful = 1 | 18 m |