Table 2 Comparison of patient data by stress urinary incontinence status
From: Effect of anogenital distance on stress urinary incontinence
Presence of SUI (n:46) | Absence of SUI (n:210) | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
Age (years)* | 38.4 ± 9.0 | 36.6 ± 9.3 | 0.200 |
Weight (kg)* | 78.1 ± 16.7 | 74.2 ± 15.6 | 0.455 |
Height (cm)* | 162.9 ± 4.6 | 162.0 ± 5.8 | 0.131 |
BMI (kg/m2)* | 29.4 ± 6.3 | 28.3 ± 5.6 | 0.215 |
ASA score | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 0.867 |
Parity n;(%) | 0.964 | ||
Nulliparous | 5 (10.9%) | 21 (10.0%) | |
Parity ≥ 1 | 41 (89.1%) | 189 (90.0%) | |
AGDAF (mm)* | 22.6 ± 7.1 | 25.5 ± 5.5 | 0.014 |
AGDAC (mm)* | 81.1 ± 9.5 | 72.2 ± 11.9 | 0.001 |
GH (mm)* | 24.4 ± 6.1 | 22.2 ± 8.3 | 0.016 |
POP-Q stage | 0.478 | ||
0 | 30 (65.2%) | 134 (63.8%) | |
1 | 12 (26.1%) | 44 (20.9%) | |
2 | 4 (8.9%) | 32 (15.2%) |