Skip to main content

Table 2 Study characteristics and outcomes of antenatal intervention for fetal lower urinary tract obstruction

From: Antenatal and postnatal management of posterior urethral valves: where do we stand?

Study

Study design

Patient characteristics

Survival outcome

Renal function outcome

Crombleholme 1990 [9]

Retrospective

40 fetuses:

16 good prognosis group (9 treated)

24 poor prognosis group (10 treated)

OS: 38%

After exclusion of elective terminations: 58% OS

Good prognosis group: 81% OS

Poor prognosis group: 13% OS

Good prognosis group: none of 9 treated survivors had ESRD

Poor prognosis group: 2/3 treated survivors had ESRD

Nicolini 1991 [12]

Retrospective

17 fetuses (8 had VAS)

Only 2 fetuses with VAS survived (25%)

The remaining patients were terminated, aborted or died in the neonatal period

The two survivors had normal RF at follow-up

Lipitz 1993 [10]

Retrospective

25 fetuses (14 had VAS)

VAS: 6/14 (43%) survived the neonatal period

No treatment: 3/11 (27%) survived the neonatal period

5/6 survivors after VAS had RI

2/3 survivors without VAS had RI

Freedman 1999 [13]

Retrospective

34 patients had VAS

17 survived > 2 years 14 studied (4 had PUV)

2-year OS: 50%

36% (5/14) had kidney transplant

21% (3/14) had RI

Of 4 PUV patients:

one had normal RF, 2 had RI and one had ESRD

3 required bladder augmentation

Morris 2013 [6]

Randomized controlled trial

31 fetuses (16 VAS, 15 no treatment)

VAS: 8/16 (50%) survived the neonatal period

No treatment: 4/15 (27%) survived the neonatal period

VAS: 2/16 patients had normal RF at 2 years

No treatment: none had normal RF at 2 years

Holmes 2001 [11]

Retrospective

14 fetuses with PUV (9 VAS, 2 FVA, 2 bladder marsupialization, 1 cutaneous ureterostomy)

8/14 (57%) survived (12 months-19 years)

5/8 (63%) survivors had RI, 2 of them had kidney transplant

Quintero 1995 [25]

Cohort

13 fetuses (4 standard VAS, 2 urethral stents, 1 PUV permeation, 4 diagnostic fetal cystoscopy only)

Standard VAS: 3/4 survived

Urethral stents: 2/2 survived

One patient had PUV permeation was terminated

VAS:

1/3 survivors had normal RF

2 had ESRD

Urethral stents: no data on RF

Welsh 2003 [26]

Cohort, retrospective

10 fetuses had intervention:

1 HA

2 HA + guidewire passage

4 guidewire only

1 HA + guidewire passage + VAS

2. guidewire + VAS

3. Only diagnostic cystoscopy

OS: 50% (5/10) in those who had intervention (16–34 months)

Overall, 3/5 survivors had normal RF

2/3 PUV survivors had normal RF

Ruano 2015 [23]

Case–control, prospectively collected data

111 fetuses (34 FVA, 16 VAS, 61 no intervention)

Intervention group: 40% 6-month OS

FVA: 38% 6-month OS

VAS: 44% 6-month OS

No intervention: 6-month 20% OS

FVA: better RF than no intervention (75% had normal RF vs. 39%)

VAS: similar RF to no intervention group (60% had normal RF vs. 39%)

  1. FVA: fetoscopic valve ablation, ESRD: end-stage renal disease, HA: hydroablation, OS: overall survival, PUV: posterior urethral valve, RF: renal function, RI: renal impairment, VAS: vesicoamniotic shunt