Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients

From: Comparison of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and conventional approach after laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomy: a retrospective analysis

 

Conventional

ERAS

p

Mean

n

Mean

n

Age

63.37 ± 7.01

 

66.36 ± 5.31

 

0.080

Comorbidity

CCMI < 4

 

16 (33.3%)

 

6 (27.3%)

0.414

CCMI ≥ 4

 

32 (66.7%)

 

16 (72.7%)

Preoperative PSA (ng/L)

10.79 ± 5.57

 

9.73 ± 5.42

 

0.457

Digital rectal examination findings

No

 

20 (41.7%)

 

10 (45.5%)

0.483

Yes

 

28 (58.3%)

 

12 (54.5%)

Extraprostatic involvement in preoperative imaging

Not view

 

2 (4.2%)

 

0 (0%)

0.557

No

 

40 (83.3%)

 

20 (90.9%)

Yes

 

6 (12.3%)

 

2 (9.1%)

 

Lymph node status

Not viewed

 

2 (4.2%)

 

0 (0%)

0.459

Absent

 

44 (91.7%)

 

20 (90.9%)

Present

 

2 (4.2%)

 

2 (9.1%)

Transrectal biopsy specimen Gleason score

Gleason = 6

 

20 (41.7%)

 

10 (45.5%)

0.206

Gleason = 7

 

14 (29.2%)

 

10 (45.5%)

Gleason = 8

 

8 (16.7%)

 

2 (9.1%)

Gleason > 8

 

6 (12.5%)

 

0 (0%)

Location of tumor

Right

 

6 (12.5%)

 

4 (18.2%)

0.806

Left

 

4 (8.3%)

 

2 (9.1%)

Bilateral

 

38 (79.2%)

 

16 (72.7%)

Time between biopsy and surgery (days)

70.67 ± 21.19

 

71.36 ± 21.07

 

0.899

Lymphadenectomy status

Not done

 

32 (66.7%)

 

18 (81.8%)

0.154

Done

 

16 (33.3%)

 

4 (18.2%)

Radical prostatectomy specimen Gleason score

Gleason = 6

 

12 (25%)

 

2 (9.1%)

0.089

Gleason = 7

 

12 (25%)

 

10 (45.5%)

Gleason = 8

 

12 (25%)

 

8 (36.4%)

Gleason > 8

 

12 (25%)

 

2 (9.1%)